-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add argument types tait tests #88332
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
label
Aug 25, 2021
@bors rollup |
spastorino
force-pushed
the
argument-types-tait-test
branch
from
August 25, 2021 16:19
c5acc17
to
a3b26b1
Compare
spastorino
commented
Aug 25, 2021
spastorino
force-pushed
the
argument-types-tait-test
branch
from
August 25, 2021 22:13
a3b26b1
to
516f7e8
Compare
spastorino
commented
Aug 25, 2021
Dylan-DPC-zz
pushed a commit
to Dylan-DPC-zz/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 26, 2021
…=jackh726 Revert "Add type of a let tait test impl trait straight in let" This reverts commit dbadab5. This is not part of TAITs, so, if tested should probably be done elsewhere. r? `@oli-obk` This is similar to what I was commenting here rust-lang#88332 (comment) These is not part of TAITs so should not live in type-alias-impl-trait test directory. I'm going to avoid adding this kind of tests in `type-alias-impl-trait` test directory and avoid thinking about them in this pass.
GuillaumeGomez
added a commit
to GuillaumeGomez/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 26, 2021
…=jackh726 Revert "Add type of a let tait test impl trait straight in let" This reverts commit dbadab5. This is not part of TAITs, so, if tested should probably be done elsewhere. r? ``@oli-obk`` This is similar to what I was commenting here rust-lang#88332 (comment) These is not part of TAITs so should not live in type-alias-impl-trait test directory. I'm going to avoid adding this kind of tests in `type-alias-impl-trait` test directory and avoid thinking about them in this pass.
spastorino
force-pushed
the
argument-types-tait-test
branch
from
August 26, 2021 14:21
516f7e8
to
4924e34
Compare
@bors r+ rollup |
📌 Commit 4924e34 has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Aug 26, 2021
Dylan-DPC-zz
pushed a commit
to Dylan-DPC-zz/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 26, 2021
…, r=oli-obk Add argument types tait tests r? `@oli-obk` Related to rust-lang#86727
Dylan-DPC-zz
pushed a commit
to Dylan-DPC-zz/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 26, 2021
…=jackh726 Revert "Add type of a let tait test impl trait straight in let" This reverts commit dbadab5. This is not part of TAITs, so, if tested should probably be done elsewhere. r? ```@oli-obk``` This is similar to what I was commenting here rust-lang#88332 (comment) These is not part of TAITs so should not live in type-alias-impl-trait test directory. I'm going to avoid adding this kind of tests in `type-alias-impl-trait` test directory and avoid thinking about them in this pass.
Manishearth
added a commit
to Manishearth/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 26, 2021
…=jackh726 Revert "Add type of a let tait test impl trait straight in let" This reverts commit dbadab5. This is not part of TAITs, so, if tested should probably be done elsewhere. r? ````@oli-obk```` This is similar to what I was commenting here rust-lang#88332 (comment) These is not part of TAITs so should not live in type-alias-impl-trait test directory. I'm going to avoid adding this kind of tests in `type-alias-impl-trait` test directory and avoid thinking about them in this pass.
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 27, 2021
…arth Rollup of 11 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#87832 (Fix debugger stepping behavior with `match` expressions) - rust-lang#88123 (Make spans for tuple patterns in E0023 more precise) - rust-lang#88215 (Reland rust-lang#83738: "rustdoc: Don't load all extern crates unconditionally") - rust-lang#88216 (Don't stabilize creation of TryReserveError instances) - rust-lang#88270 (Handle type ascription type ops in NLL HRTB diagnostics) - rust-lang#88289 (Fixes for LLVM change 0f45c16) - rust-lang#88320 (type_implements_trait consider obligation failure on overflow) - rust-lang#88332 (Add argument types tait tests) - rust-lang#88340 (Add `c_size_t` and `c_ssize_t` to `std::os::raw`.) - rust-lang#88346 (Revert "Add type of a let tait test impl trait straight in let") - rust-lang#88348 (Add field types tait tests) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
r? @oli-obk
Related to #86727