Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix minor spelling error in Poll::ready docs #89799

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 12, 2021

Conversation

ast-ral
Copy link
Contributor

@ast-ral ast-ral commented Oct 12, 2021

Fixes minor spelling error in the proposed Poll::ready docs. Not that my opinion matters, but +1 on the original PR (#89651), it reads much nicer to me than the ready! macro.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @joshtriplett

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Oct 12, 2021
@joshtriplett
Copy link
Member

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 12, 2021

📌 Commit 5100630 has been approved by joshtriplett

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Oct 12, 2021
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 12, 2021
…htriplett

fix minor spelling error in Poll::ready docs

Fixes minor spelling error in the proposed `Poll::ready` docs. Not that my opinion matters, but +1 on the original PR (rust-lang#89651), it reads much nicer to me than the `ready!` macro.
the8472 added a commit to the8472/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 12, 2021
…htriplett

fix minor spelling error in Poll::ready docs

Fixes minor spelling error in the proposed `Poll::ready` docs. Not that my opinion matters, but +1 on the original PR (rust-lang#89651), it reads much nicer to me than the `ready!` macro.
This was referenced Oct 12, 2021
@ibraheemdev
Copy link
Member

Oops, thanks for catching this :)

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 12, 2021
Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#89778 (Add #[must_use] to as_type conversions)
 - rust-lang#89784 (Remove built-in query cache_hit tracking)
 - rust-lang#89796 (Add #[must_use] to non-mutating verb methods)
 - rust-lang#89797 (Add #[must_use] to is_condition tests)
 - rust-lang#89799 (fix minor spelling error in Poll::ready docs)
 - rust-lang#89800 (Update books)
 - rust-lang#89809 (Remap ssa RealPredicate to llvm RealPredicate)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 7017410 into rust-lang:master Oct 12, 2021
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.57.0 milestone Oct 12, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants