-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rollup of 10 pull requests #89939
Rollup of 10 pull requests #89939
Conversation
As per the libs team decision in rust-lang#58935. Closes rust-lang#58935
In `splice_lines`, there is some arithmetic to compute the required alignment such that future substitutions in a suggestion are aligned correctly. However, this assumed that the current substitution's span was only on a single line. In circumstances where this was not true, it could result in a arithmetic overflow when the substitution's end column was less than the substitution's start column. Signed-off-by: David Wood <david.wood@huawei.com>
The fuchsia platform is in the process of softly transitioning over to using a new value for ZX_INFO_PROCESS with a new corresponding struct. This change migrates libstd. See fxrev.dev/510478 and fxbug.dev/30751 for more detail.
…_unchecked, r=oli-obk Stabilize `unreachable_unchecked` as `const fn` Closes rust-lang#53188 This PR stabilizes `core::hint::unreachable_unchecked` as `const fn`. MIRI is able to detect when this method is called. Stabilization was delayed until `const_panic` was stabilized so as to avoid users calling this method in its place (thus resulting in runtime UB). With rust-lang#89508, that is no longer an issue. ````@rustbot```` label +A-const-eval +A-const-fn +T-lang +S-blocked (not sure why it's T-lang, but that's what the tracking issue is)
…htriplett Remove alloc::prelude As per the libs team decision in rust-lang#58935. Closes rust-lang#58935
…nly, r=workingjubilee Restrict the aarch64 outline atomics test to Linux The test was introduced in rust-lang#83655, which enables the `outline-atomics` feature for aarch64-unknown-linux-* but not for any other aarch64 targets. The test did not check for Linux causing test failures on aarch64-apple-darwin. r? `@workingjubilee`
…ustdoc-json-types, r=CraftSpider Moved format-version constant to rustdoc-json-types Addresses rust-lang#88620 Moved format-version constant from rustdoc to rustdoc-json-types.
…ultiple-lines, r=oli-obk emitter: current substitution can be multi-line Fixes rust-lang#89280. In `splice_lines`, there is some arithmetic to compute the required alignment such that future substitutions in a suggestion are aligned correctly. However, this assumed that the current substitution's span was only on a single line. In circumstances where this was not true, it could result in a arithmetic overflow when the substitution's end column was less than the substitution's start column. r? ````@oli-obk````
…=estebank Emit impl difference error for GenericBoundFailure too Fixes rust-lang#86787 r? ````@estebank````
…tsakis Some outlives cleanup No semantic changes here, only moving code around + using `LocalDefId` instead of `HirId` r? ````@nikomatsakis````
Add some GATs related regression tests Closes rust-lang#88287, closes rust-lang#88405
[fuchsia] Update process info struct The fuchsia platform is in the process of softly transitioning over to using a new value for ZX_INFO_PROCESS with a new corresponding struct. This change migrates libstd. See [fxrev.dev/510478](https://fxrev.dev/510478) and [fxbug.dev/30751](https://fxbug.dev/30751) for more detail.
… r=m-ou-se updating docs to mention usage of AtomicBool Mouse mentioned we should point out that atomic bool is used by the std lib these days. ( m-ou-se/getrandom#1 )
@bors r+ p=10 rollup=never |
📌 Commit 8e20470 has been approved by |
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
Finished benchmarking commit (7fbd4ce): comparison url. Summary: This change led to large relevant mixed results 🤷 in compiler performance.
If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf. Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this perf run, please indicate this with @rustbot label: +perf-regression |
If I had to guess, I'd say #89915 is the most likely culprit for performance regressions as it touches parts of the compiler that can be associated with perf changes (e.g., type checking) unlike most of the other PRs which only touch docs or tests. We could try reverting it, and seeing if it helps. |
It could be. If I had to guess a specific commit, I would guess d3fa07c |
Successful merges:
unreachable_unchecked
asconst fn
#89509 (Stabilizeunreachable_unchecked
asconst fn
)Failed merges:
r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup