-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Deduplicate projection sub-obligations #90423
Conversation
r? @estebank (rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
@bors try @rust-timer queue |
Awaiting bors try build completion. @rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-perf |
⌛ Trying commit 67da0ff with merge cb8c3c7f79618921c9e00796b8e06ca3cab56a7d... |
☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions |
Queued cb8c3c7f79618921c9e00796b8e06ca3cab56a7d with parent 9f13083, future comparison URL. |
Finished benchmarking commit (cb8c3c7f79618921c9e00796b8e06ca3cab56a7d): comparison url. Summary: This change led to very large relevant mixed results 🤷 in compiler performance.
If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf. Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR led to changes in compiler perf. Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this try perf run, please indicate this with @bors rollup=never |
@bors try @rust-timer queue |
Awaiting bors try build completion. @rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-perf |
⌛ Trying commit 851f2b2 with merge 09e9d70171a9e1fd087e1df3ba394cd042192e55... |
☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions |
Queued 09e9d70171a9e1fd087e1df3ba394cd042192e55 with parent e249ce6, future comparison URL. |
Finished benchmarking commit (09e9d70171a9e1fd087e1df3ba394cd042192e55): comparison url. Summary: This change led to very large relevant mixed results 🤷 in compiler performance.
If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf. Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR led to changes in compiler perf. Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this try perf run, please indicate this with @bors rollup=never |
@bors try @rust-timer queue |
Awaiting bors try build completion. @rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-perf |
⌛ Trying commit 39d44e7 with merge c40d55a7c903301595ddd3928033fcc9dcca2036... |
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
Finished benchmarking commit (4c9bdf4): comparison url. Summary: This change led to very large relevant mixed results 🤷 in compiler performance.
If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf. Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this perf run, please indicate this with @rustbot label: +perf-regression |
I'm actually going to beta and stable nominate this. The perf regressions that this fixes are pretty bad. |
beta-accepted in tandem with #91065 |
declining for stable-backport. @rustbot: -label: stable-nominated |
@rustbot label: -stable-nominated |
…ulacrum [beta] backports Backports these PRs: * Fix HashStable implementation on InferTy rust-lang#91892 * Revert setting a default for the MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET env var for linking rust-lang#91870 * Make rustdoc headings black, and markdown blue rust-lang#91534 * Disable LLVM newPM by default rust-lang#91190 * Deduplicate projection sub-obligations rust-lang#90423 * Sync portable-simd to remove autosplats rust-lang#91484 by dropping portable_simd entirely (keeping the subtree, just from std/core) * Quote bat script command line rust-lang#92208 * Fix failing tests rust-lang#92201 (CI fix) r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
No description provided.