-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update libc to 0.2.108 #90681
Update libc to 0.2.108 #90681
Conversation
(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
r? @JohnTitor @bors r+ rollup=iffy in case we have another failure |
📌 Commit 72ae5a3 has been approved by |
…itor Update libc to 0.2.107 Changelog: https://github.com/rust-lang/libc/releases/tag/0.2.107 Primarily intended to pull in rust-lang/libc@fd331f6 This should help with rust-lang#90044
⌛ Testing commit 72ae5a3 with merge 04c52485bf309f801b8408b3cfebb9a1adb80c39... |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
Scope in Send, Sync for wasi Without this, libc fails during the build of rustc. See: rust-lang/rust#90681 Alternative solution: It's not clear this is necessary for core to finish building, so maybe we should cfg it out in that case, instead?
Scope in Send, Sync for wasi Without this, libc fails during the build of rustc. See rust-lang/rust#90681 This dependency was introduced in #2499. Alternative solution: It's not clear this is necessary for core to finish building, so maybe we should `#[cfg]` it out in that case, instead?
@bors r- blocked by a libc release (>0.2.107) which includes rust-lang/libc#2528 |
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #90382) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
0.2.108 is released. |
⌛ Testing commit 9a04ae4 with merge 01b7b73a52158e98d6d4053db007300e5c17b524... |
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
|
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
Seems spurious, @bors retry |
⌛ Testing commit 9a04ae4 with merge f00f0005b1244de9a463e903e54c7f3416e181f6... |
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
|
Spurious LNK1201 #81890 |
@bors retry |
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
Finished benchmarking commit (350158d): comparison url. Summary: This change led to very large relevant mixed results 🤷 in compiler performance.
If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf. Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this perf run, please indicate this with @rustbot label: +perf-regression |
Changelog:
https://github.com/rust-lang/libc/releases/tag/0.2.107
https://github.com/rust-lang/libc/releases/tag/0.2.108
Primarily intended to pull in rust-lang/libc@fd331f6
This should help with #90044