Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 6 pull requests #91159

Merged
merged 14 commits into from
Nov 23, 2021
Merged

Rollup of 6 pull requests #91159

merged 14 commits into from
Nov 23, 2021

Conversation

matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

jsha and others added 14 commits November 21, 2021 00:53
A byproduct of using `<details>` and `<summary>` to show/hide detailed
documentation was that clicking any part of a method heading (or impl
heading) would show or hide the documentation. This was not super
noticeable because clicking a link inside the method heading would
navigate to that link. But clicking any unlinked black text in a method
heading would trigger the behavior.

That behavior was somewhat unexpected, and means that if you try to click
a type name in a method heading, but miss by a few pixels, you get a
confusing surprise.

This change inhibits that behavior by putting an event listener on most
summaries that cancels the event unless the event target was the summary
itself. In practice, that means it cancels the event unless the target
was the "[+]" / "[-]", because the rest of the heading is wrapped inside
a `<div>`, which is the target for anything that doesn't have a more
specific target.
Doc Jones mentioned that one of the things making it hard to get started
is that the amount of information is overwhelming, between the
dev-guide, contributing guide, and discussion platforms. This gives
people a single link they can click to ask for help.
According to documentation, the listed errnos should only occur
if the `copy_file_range` call cannot be made at all, so the
assert be correct.  However, since in practice file system
drivers (incl. FUSE etc.) can return any errno they want, we
should not panic here.

Fixes rust-lang#91152
…llocator-api-in-tuple, r=davidtwco

Suggestion to wrap inner types using 'allocator_api' in tuple

This PR provides a suggestion to wrap the inner types in tuple when being along with 'allocator_api'.

Closes rust-lang#83250

```rust
fn main() {
    let _vec: Vec<u8, _> = vec![]; //~ ERROR use of unstable library feature 'allocator_api'
}
```

```diff
 error[E0658]: use of unstable library feature 'allocator_api'
   --> $DIR/suggest-vec-allocator-api.rs:2:23
    |
 LL |     let _vec: Vec<u8, _> = vec![];
-   |                       ^
+   |                   ----^
+   |                   |
+   |                   help: consider wrapping the inner types in tuple: `(u8, _)`
    |
    = note: see issue rust-lang#32838 <rust-lang#32838> for more information
    = help: add `#![feature(allocator_api)]` to the crate attributes to enable
```
…, r=Manishearth,GuillaumeGomez

Inhibit clicks on summary's children

A byproduct of using `<details>` and `<summary>` to show/hide detailed documentation was that clicking any part of a method heading (or impl heading) would show or hide the documentation. This was not super noticeable because clicking a link inside the method heading would navigate to that link. But clicking any unlinked black text in a method heading would trigger the behavior.

That behavior was somewhat unexpected, and means that if you try to click a type name in a method heading, but miss by a few pixels, you get a confusing surprise.

This change inhibits that behavior by putting an event listener on most summaries that cancels the event unless the event target was the summary itself. In practice, that means it cancels the event unless the target was the "[+]" / "[-]", because the rest of the heading is wrapped inside a `<div>`, which is the target for anything that doesn't have a more specific target.

r? ``@Manishearth``
Give people a single link they can click in the contributing guide

Doc Jones mentioned that one of the things making it hard to get started
is that the amount of information is overwhelming, between the
dev-guide, contributing guide, and discussion platforms. This gives
people a single link they can click to ask for help.

cc ``@doc-jones`` - is this what you had in mind?
Split inline const to two feature gates and mark expression position inline const complete

This PR splits inline const in pattern position into its own `#![feature(inline_const_pat)]` feature gate, and make the usage in expression position complete.

I think I have resolved most outstanding issues related to `inline_const` with rust-lang#89561 and other PRs. The only thing left that I am aware of is rust-lang#90150 and the lack of lifetime checks when inline const is used in pattern position (FIXME in rust-lang#89561). Implementation-wise when used in pattern position it has to be lowered during MIR building while in expression position it's evaluated only when monomorphizing (just like normal consts), so it makes some sense to separate it into two feature gates so one can progress without being blocked by another.

``@rustbot`` label: T-compiler F-inline_const
…enkov

Use `derive_default_enum` in the compiler

Let's get this feature some real-world love.

``@rustbot`` label: +C-cleanup +S-waiting-on-review
…the8472

kernel_copy: avoid panic on unexpected OS error

According to documentation, the listed errnos should only occur
if the `copy_file_range` call cannot be made at all, so the
assert be correct.  However, since in practice file system
drivers (incl. FUSE etc.) can return any errno they want, we
should not panic here.

Fixes rust-lang#91152
@rustbot rustbot added the rollup A PR which is a rollup label Nov 23, 2021
@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=6

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 23, 2021

📌 Commit 3dc0011 has been approved by matthiaskrgr

@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Nov 23, 2021
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 23, 2021

⌛ Testing commit 3dc0011 with merge 65c55bf...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 23, 2021

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: matthiaskrgr
Pushing 65c55bf to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Nov 23, 2021
@bors bors merged commit 65c55bf into rust-lang:master Nov 23, 2021
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.58.0 milestone Nov 23, 2021
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (65c55bf): comparison url.

Summary: This change led to moderate relevant improvements 🎉 in compiler performance.

  • Moderate improvement in instruction counts (up to -0.6% on full builds of match-stress-enum)

If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf.

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

@matthiaskrgr matthiaskrgr deleted the rollup-91mgg5v branch November 25, 2021 19:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 participants