Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix const deref methods display #91291
Fix const deref methods display #91291
Changes from all commits
588a99b
0c1b0f7
b647c90
02782bb
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm, shouldn't stability be shown? Or I guess it depends on when the Deref impl was added too.
Weirdly, https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/std/string/struct.String.html#deref-methods-str shows regular and const stability, but https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/std/path/struct.PathBuf.html#deref-methods-Path shows neither. Something fishy's going on with re-exports, since https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/alloc/string/struct.String.html#deref-methods-str shows stability for some methods but not all and is missing many methods that the std version has. (I think I opened an issue for part of this at some point.)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Since you already opened the issue, I'll mark this discussion as resolved.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No, the issue I opened was just about how different methods were shown between std and alloc. But I guess this bug is unrelated to this PR?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I thought
1.0.0
without the const version is hidden. Maybe that's why? If there is a stable const version, then we show1.0.0 (const: 1.xx.0)
orconst: unstable
.