-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rollup of 6 pull requests #91413
Closed
Closed
Rollup of 6 pull requests #91413
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
... if they use arbitrary enum discriminant. Code like ```rust enum Enum { Foo = 1, Bar(), Baz{} } ``` seems to be unintentionally allowed so we couldn't disallow them now, but we could disallow them if arbitrary enum discriminant is used before 1.56 hits stable.
When we point at a binding to suggest giving it a type, erase all the type for ADTs that have been resolved, leaving only the ones that could not be inferred. For small shallow types this is not a problem, but for big nested types with lots of params, this can otherwise cause a lot of unnecessary visual output.
When the value of a const param isn't inferred, replace it with the param name from the definition.
Version 5 adds Branch Regions which are a prerequisite for branch coverage. Version 6 can use the zeroth filename as prefix for other relative files.
This commit augments Swatinem's initial commit in uncommitted PR rust-lang#90047, which was a great starting point, but did not fully support LLVM Coverage Mapping Format version 6. Version 6 requires adding the compilation directory when file paths are relative, and since Rustc coverage maps use relative paths, we should add the expected compilation directory entry. Note, however, that with the compilation directory, coverage reports from `llvm-cov show` can now report file names (when the report includes more than one file) with the full absolute path to the file. This would be a problem for test results, but the workaround (for the rust coverage tests) is to include an additional `llvm-cov show` parameter: `--compilation-dir=.`
Disallow non-c-like but "fieldless" ADTs from being casted to integer if they use arbitrary enum discriminant Code like ```rust #[repr(u8)] enum Enum { Foo /* = 0 */, Bar(), Baz{} } let x = Enum::Bar() as u8; ``` seems to be unintentionally allowed so we couldn't disallow them now ~~, but we could disallow them if arbitrary enum discriminant is used before 1.56 hits stable~~ (stabilization was reverted). Related: rust-lang#88621 `@rustbot` label +T-lang
…=nagisa Only shown relevant type params in E0283 label When we point at a binding to suggest giving it a type, erase all the type for ADTs that have been resolved, leaving only the ones that could not be inferred. For small shallow types this is not a problem, but for big nested types with lots of params, this can otherwise cause a lot of unnecessary visual output.
Use `get_diagnostic_name` more
…kh726 Remove all migrate.nll.stderr files There are a few ui tests that setup the revisions like: ```rust // revisions: migrate nll` // [nll]compile-flags: -Zborrowck=mir ``` However most of them fail to disable the nll compare mode like this: ```rust // ignore-compare-mode-nll ``` This ends up generating confusing files ending in `.migrate.nll.stderr` because the nll compare mode is run on top of the migrate revision. This PR fixes this by adding `ignore-compare-mode-nll` to these tests. I would have just made these tests use compare modes instead but I assume the reason these tests are messing around with revisions instead of just letting the nll compare mode do its thing is to enforce error annotations for both migrate and nll. Relying on just compare modes would only have the error annotations for migrate.
… r=tmandry Add support for LLVM coverage mapping format versions 5 and 6 This PR cherry-pick's Swatinem's initial commit in unsubmitted PR rust-lang#90047. My additional commit augments Swatinem's great starting point, but adds full support for LLVM Coverage Mapping Format version 6, conditionally, if compiling with LLVM 13. Version 6 requires adding the compilation directory when file paths are relative, and since Rustc coverage maps use relative paths, we should add the expected compilation directory entry. Note, however, that with the compilation directory, coverage reports from `llvm-cov show` can now report file names (when the report includes more than one file) with the full absolute path to the file. This would be a problem for test results, but the workaround (for the rust coverage tests) is to include an additional `llvm-cov show` parameter: `--compilation-dir=.`
…l, r=cjgillot Improve error message for `E0659` if the source is not available Fixes rust-lang#91028. The fix is similar to those in rust-lang#89233 and rust-lang#87088. With this change, instead of the dangling ``` note: `Option` could also refer to the enum defined here ``` I get ``` note: `Option` could also refer to an enum from prelude ``` If the standard library source code _is_ available, the output does not change.
@bors r+ rollup=never p=6 |
📌 Commit 90af5e6 has been approved by |
bors
added
the
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
label
Dec 1, 2021
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
|
@bors r- 😄 |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-author
Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author.
and removed
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
labels
Dec 1, 2021
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
S-waiting-on-author
Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
get_diagnostic_name
more #90985 (Useget_diagnostic_name
more)E0659
if the source is not available #91298 (Improve error message forE0659
if the source is not available)Failed merges:
r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup