Don't fall back to crate-level opaque type definitions. #92045
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rustbot
added
the
T-compiler
|
(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
Blocked on #90948. |
petrochenkov
added
S-blocked
That would just hide bugs, as it works accidentally if the opaque type is defined at the crate level.
oli-obk
added
S-waiting-on-author
oli-obk
added
S-waiting-on-review
|
This is now ready for review |
|
@bors r+ |
|
📌 Commit 956db07 has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 14, 2022
Don't fall back to crate-level opaque type definitions. That would just hide bugs, as it works accidentally if the opaque type is defined at the crate level. Only works after rust-lang#90948 which worked by accident for our entire test suite.
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 14, 2022
Don't fall back to crate-level opaque type definitions. That would just hide bugs, as it works accidentally if the opaque type is defined at the crate level. Only works after rust-lang#90948 which worked by accident for our entire test suite.
This was referenced Jan 14, 2022
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 14, 2022
…askrgr Rollup of 9 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#92045 (Don't fall back to crate-level opaque type definitions.) - rust-lang#92381 (Suggest `return`ing tail expressions in async functions) - rust-lang#92768 (Partially stabilize `maybe_uninit_extra`) - rust-lang#92810 (Deduplicate box deref and regular deref suggestions) - rust-lang#92818 (Update documentation for doc_cfg feature) - rust-lang#92840 (Fix some lints documentation) - rust-lang#92849 (Clippyup) - rust-lang#92854 (Use the updated Rust logo in rustdoc) - rust-lang#92864 (Fix a missing dot in the main item heading) Failed merges: - rust-lang#92838 (Clean up some links in RELEASES) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
That would just hide bugs, as it works accidentally if the opaque type is defined at the crate level.
Only works after #90948 which worked by accident for our entire test suite.