-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rollup of 6 pull requests #92564
Closed
Closed
Rollup of 6 pull requests #92564
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Currently the output of a command like `./x.py build --stage 0 library/std` is this: ``` Updating only changed submodules Submodules updated in 0.02 seconds extracting [...] Compiling [...] Finished dev [unoptimized] target(s) in 17.53s Building stage0 std artifacts (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -> x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Compling [...] Finished release [optimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 21.99s Copying stage0 std from stage0 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -> x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu / x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Build completed successfully in 0:00:51 ``` I find the part before the "Building stage0 std artifacts" a bit confusing. After this commit, it looks like this: ``` Updating only changed submodules Submodules updated in 0.02 seconds extracting [...] Building rustbuild Compiling [...] Finished dev [unoptimized] target(s) in 17.53s Building stage0 std artifacts (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -> x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Compling [...] Finished release [optimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 21.99s Copying stage0 std from stage0 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -> x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu / x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Build completed successfully in 0:00:51 ``` The "Building rustbuild" label makes it clear what the first cargo build invocation is for. The indentation of the "Submodules updated" line indicates it is a sub-step of a parent task.
They're a bit out of date, and overly complicated.
… r=Mark-Simulacrum Label more build steps Some small improvements. r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
rustdoc: Clean up NestedAttributesExt trait/implementation
…, r=dtolnay Add another implementation example to Debug trait As per the discussion in: rust-lang#92276
…imitive-types, r=Manishearth Rustdoc: resolve associated traits for non-generic primitive types Fixes rust-lang#90703 This seems to work: <img width="457" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2807772/147774059-9556ff96-4519-409e-8ed0-c33ecc436171.png"> I'm just afraid I might have missed some cases / broken previous functionality. I also have not written tests yet, I will have to take a look to see where tests are and how they are structured, but any help there is also appreciated.
Explicitly pass `PATH` to the Windows exe resolver This allows for testing different `PATH`s without using the actual environment.
Extract init_env_logger to crate I've been doing some work on rustc_ast_pretty using an out-of-tree main.rs and Cargo.toml with the following: ```toml [dependencies] rustc_ast = { path = "../rust/compiler/rustc_ast" } rustc_ast_pretty = { path = "../rust/compiler/rustc_ast_pretty" } rustc_span = { path = "../rust/compiler/rustc_span" } ``` Rustc_ast_pretty helpfully uses `tracing::debug!` but I found that in order to enable the debug output, my test crate must depend on rustc_driver which is an enormously bigger dependency than what I have been using so far, and slows down iteration time because an enormous dependency tree between rustc_ast and rustc_driver must now be rebuilt after every ast change. I pulled out the tracing initialization to a new minimal rustc_log crate so that projects depending on the other rustc crates, like rustc_ast_pretty, can access the `debug!` messages in them without building all the rest of rustc.
rustbot
added
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
T-rustdoc
Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
labels
Jan 4, 2022
@bors r+ rollup=never p=6 |
📌 Commit 06c372a has been approved by |
bors
added
the
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
label
Jan 4, 2022
⌛ Testing commit 06c372a with merge fc2e38db10d4d6fce5d2bd3b6ebe333e7cdadc22... |
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
|
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
and removed
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
labels
Jan 5, 2022
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
T-rustdoc
Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
PATH
to the Windows exe resolver #92517 (Explicitly passPATH
to the Windows exe resolver)Failed merges:
r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup