Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Parse Ty? as Option<Ty> and provide structured suggestion #92746

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 16, 2022

Conversation

estebank
Copy link
Contributor

Swift has specific syntax that desugars to Option<T> similar to our
? operator, which means that people might try to use it in Rust. Parse
it and gracefully recover.

@rustbot rustbot added the T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Jan 10, 2022
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @davidtwco

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jan 10, 2022
@camelid camelid added the A-suggestion-diagnostics Area: Suggestions generated by the compiler applied by `cargo fix` label Jan 10, 2022
@estebank estebank force-pushed the question-mark-in-type branch from 31447cc to 16ce938 Compare January 12, 2022 23:49
Swift has specific syntax that desugars to `Option<T>` similar to our
`?` operator, which means that people might try to use it in Rust. Parse
it and gracefully recover.
@estebank estebank force-pushed the question-mark-in-type branch from 16ce938 to cfc0bd1 Compare January 14, 2022 00:07
Copy link
Member

@davidtwco davidtwco left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Apologies for the delay in reviewing this. This looks great.

@davidtwco
Copy link
Member

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 16, 2022

📌 Commit cfc0bd1 has been approved by davidtwco

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jan 16, 2022
@scottmcm
Copy link
Member

Nice touch! C# has the same, where int? is sugar for Nullable<int>.

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 16, 2022
…askrgr

Rollup of 10 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#92487 (Fix unclosed boxes in pretty printing of TraitAlias)
 - rust-lang#92581 (ARMv6K Horizon - Enable default libraries)
 - rust-lang#92619 (Add diagnostic items for macros)
 - rust-lang#92635 (rustdoc: Yet more intra-doc links cleanup)
 - rust-lang#92646 (feat: rustc_pass_by_value lint attribute)
 - rust-lang#92706 (Clarify explicitly that BTree{Map,Set} are ordered.)
 - rust-lang#92710 (Include Projections when elaborating TypeOutlives)
 - rust-lang#92746 (Parse `Ty?` as `Option<Ty>` and provide structured suggestion)
 - rust-lang#92792 (rustdoc: fix intra-link for generic trait impls)
 - rust-lang#92814 (remove unused FIXME)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 9323a0d into rust-lang:master Jan 16, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.60.0 milestone Jan 16, 2022
estebank added a commit to estebank/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 4, 2022
Dylan-DPC added a commit to Dylan-DPC/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 4, 2022
Do not recover from `Ty?` in macro parsing

Follow up to rust-lang#92746. Address rust-lang#94510.
Dylan-DPC added a commit to Dylan-DPC/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 4, 2022
Do not recover from `Ty?` in macro parsing

Follow up to rust-lang#92746. Address rust-lang#94510.
Dylan-DPC added a commit to Dylan-DPC/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 4, 2022
Do not recover from `Ty?` in macro parsing

Follow up to rust-lang#92746. Address rust-lang#94510.
Dylan-DPC added a commit to Dylan-DPC/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 4, 2022
Do not recover from `Ty?` in macro parsing

Follow up to rust-lang#92746. Address rust-lang#94510.
Dylan-DPC added a commit to Dylan-DPC/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 4, 2022
Do not recover from `Ty?` in macro parsing

Follow up to rust-lang#92746. Address rust-lang#94510.
Dylan-DPC added a commit to Dylan-DPC/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 4, 2022
Do not recover from `Ty?` in macro parsing

Follow up to rust-lang#92746. Address rust-lang#94510.
Dylan-DPC added a commit to Dylan-DPC/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 4, 2022
Do not recover from `Ty?` in macro parsing

Follow up to rust-lang#92746. Address rust-lang#94510.
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 4, 2022
Do not recover from `Ty?` in macro parsing

Follow up to rust-lang#92746. Address rust-lang#94510.
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 4, 2022
Do not recover from `Ty?` in macro parsing

Follow up to rust-lang#92746. Address rust-lang#94510.
Dylan-DPC added a commit to Dylan-DPC/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 4, 2022
Do not recover from `Ty?` in macro parsing

Follow up to rust-lang#92746. Address rust-lang#94510.
cuviper pushed a commit to cuviper/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 18, 2022
Follow up to rust-lang#92746. Address rust-lang#94510.

(cherry picked from commit 004f2ed)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-suggestion-diagnostics Area: Suggestions generated by the compiler applied by `cargo fix` S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants