-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix const_ptr_offset_from tracking issue #92981
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
r? @dtolnay (rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
label
Jan 16, 2022
dtolnay
approved these changes
Jan 16, 2022
@bors r+ rollup |
📌 Commit 89c2955ed4c5ffa327c2ecbb8a1091914ff5d4ba has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Jan 16, 2022
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
@bors r- |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-author
Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author.
and removed
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
labels
Jan 16, 2022
RalfJung
force-pushed
the
const_ptr_offset_from
branch
from
January 16, 2022 20:21
89c2955
to
bb1423e
Compare
@bors r+ |
📌 Commit bb1423e has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-author
Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author.
labels
Jan 16, 2022
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 17, 2022
…askrgr Rollup of 10 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#92795 (Link sidebar "location" heading to top of page) - rust-lang#92799 (Remove some unnecessary uses of `FieldDef::ident`) - rust-lang#92808 (Fix `try wrapping expression in variant` suggestion with struct field shorthand) - rust-lang#92819 (rustdoc: remove hand-rolled isatty) - rust-lang#92876 (Fix suggesting turbofish with lifetime arguments) - rust-lang#92921 (Rename Printer constructor from mk_printer() to Printer::new()) - rust-lang#92937 (rustdoc: Add missing dot separator) - rust-lang#92953 (Copy an example to PartialOrd as well) - rust-lang#92977 (Docs: recommend VecDeque instead of Vec::remove(0)) - rust-lang#92981 (fix const_ptr_offset_from tracking issue) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The old tracking issue #41079 was for exposing those functions at all, and got closed when they were stabilized. We had nothing tracking their
const
ness so I opened a new tracking issue: #92980.