-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Check the number of arguments first in is_recursive_call
#93381
Conversation
@bors try @rust-timer queue |
Awaiting bors try build completion. @rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-perf |
⌛ Trying commit a787dbde8ec8c2fd0a3b3c50e83191909274d1ea with merge c8a909af71d1fc4059328c1f9f91b03e269f85e8... |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions |
Queued c8a909af71d1fc4059328c1f9f91b03e269f85e8 with parent 21b4a9c, future comparison URL. |
Finished benchmarking commit (c8a909af71d1fc4059328c1f9f91b03e269f85e8): comparison url. Summary: This benchmark run shows 36 relevant improvements 🎉 to instruction counts.
If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf. Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR led to changes in compiler perf. @bors rollup=never |
Seems to have entirely fixed the regression in #92889. Sweet! @tmiasko could you add a comment to the early return indicating that it's for performance reasons? r=me when that is done. |
a787dbd
to
fb7b4f4
Compare
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
fb7b4f4
to
35b5daa
Compare
📌 Commit 35b5daa has been approved by |
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
Finished benchmarking commit (745e926): comparison url. Summary: This benchmark run shows 29 relevant improvements 🎉 to instruction counts.
If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf. @rustbot label: -perf-regression |
No description provided.