Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Fix negative overlap check regions #93652

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Feb 14, 2022
Merged

Fix negative overlap check regions #93652

merged 9 commits into from
Feb 14, 2022

Conversation

spastorino
Copy link
Member

@spastorino spastorino commented Feb 4, 2022 •
edited
Loading

@rustbot rustbot added the T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Feb 4, 2022
@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Feb 4, 2022
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
@spastorino spastorino force-pushed the fix-negative-overlap-check-regions branch from 59cd5d0 to 570b6be Compare February 4, 2022 17:30
@spastorino spastorino force-pushed the fix-negative-overlap-check-regions branch from 570b6be to 1f08f20 Compare February 8, 2022 20:02
@spastorino
Copy link
Member Author

spastorino commented Feb 8, 2022 •
edited
Loading

@nikomatsakis have tried your suggestions but doesn't work. https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/570b6bec43c55e62a2a5b67b134a6bbae051c698/compiler/rustc_infer/src/infer/outlives/obligations.rs#L179 returns None and then we hit ...

error: internal compiler error: no region-bound-pairs for HirId { owner: DefId(0:0 ~ coherence_overlap_with_regions[7775]), local_id: 0 }

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
@nikomatsakis
Copy link
Contributor

@rustbot author

@spastorino and I discussed how to proceed here and he is going to apply those changes.

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Feb 9, 2022
@spastorino spastorino force-pushed the fix-negative-overlap-check-regions branch 2 times, most recently from c0ff661 to 0232de9 Compare February 9, 2022 22:39
@spastorino spastorino marked this pull request as ready for review February 10, 2022 02:44
@spastorino spastorino force-pushed the fix-negative-overlap-check-regions branch from 9ca7909 to c10dbf7 Compare February 10, 2022 19:40
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
@spastorino spastorino force-pushed the fix-negative-overlap-check-regions branch from c10dbf7 to d9e160e Compare February 10, 2022 20:14
@nikomatsakis nikomatsakis mentioned this pull request Feb 10, 2022
Closed
@nikomatsakis
Copy link
Contributor

@bors rollup=never r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 10, 2022

📌 Commit a17311400f510903fa3c9f253c735243d5f0dc8a has been approved by nikomatsakis

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Feb 10, 2022
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 11, 2022

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #93893) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Feb 11, 2022
@spastorino spastorino force-pushed the fix-negative-overlap-check-regions branch from a173114 to 3c7fa0b Compare February 14, 2022 16:11
@spastorino
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r=nikomatsakis

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 14, 2022

📌 Commit 3c7fa0b has been approved by nikomatsakis

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Feb 14, 2022
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 14, 2022

⌛ Testing commit 3c7fa0b with merge c5c610a...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 14, 2022

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: nikomatsakis
Pushing c5c610a to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Feb 14, 2022
@bors bors merged commit c5c610a into rust-lang:master Feb 14, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.60.0 milestone Feb 14, 2022
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (c5c610a): comparison url.

Summary: This benchmark run did not return any relevant results.

If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf.

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@nikomatsakis nikomatsakis nikomatsakis approved these changes

Assignees

@nikomatsakis nikomatsakis

Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
1.60.0
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
7 participants
@spastorino @rust-log-analyzer @nikomatsakis @bors @rust-timer @rust-highfive @rustbot