-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rollup of 9 pull requests #94103
Rollup of 9 pull requests #94103
Conversation
Tweaked `try_collect()` to accept more `Try` types Updated feature attribute for tracking issue
Signed-off-by: Alex Saveau <saveau.alexandre@gmail.com>
I have found this code confusing for years. I've always roughly understood it, but never exactly. I just made my fourth(?) attempt and finally cracked it. This commit improves the comments. In particular, it explicitly describes how you can't do a custom fold/visit of any type; there are actually a handful of "types of interest" (e.g. `Ty`, `Predicate`, `Region`, `Const`) that can be custom folded/visted, and all other types just get a generic traversal. I think this was the part that eluded me on all my prior attempts at understanding. The commit also updates comments to account for some newer changes such as the fallible/infallible folding distinction, does some minor reorderings, and moves one `impl` to a better place.
It seems to be unused and it is incorrect for arm/aarch64 anyway.
Update tracking issue numbers for inline assembly sub-features The main tracking issue for inline assembly is [closed](rust-lang#72016 (comment)), further tracking of the remaining sub-features has been moved to separate tracking issues.
…s, r=BoxyUwU Improve comments about type folding/visiting. I have found this code confusing for years. I've always roughly understood it, but never exactly. I just made my fourth(?) attempt and finally cracked it. This commit improves the comments. In particular, it explicitly describes how you can't do a custom fold/visit of any type; there are actually a handful of "types of interest" (e.g. `Ty`, `Predicate`, `Region`, `Const`) that can be custom folded/visted, and all other types just get a generic traversal. I think this was the part that eluded me on all my prior attempts at understanding. The commit also updates comments to account for some newer changes such as the fallible/infallible folding distinction, does some minor reorderings, and moves one `impl` to a better place. r? `@BoxyUwU`
…jsha Generate list instead of div items in sidebar Fixes rust-lang#92986. Surprisingly, we didn't have much CSS for this... [Demo](https://rustdoc.crud.net/imperio/links-in-sidebar/std/index.html). r? `@jsha`
Add MAIN_SEPARATOR_STR Currently, if someone needs access to the path separator as a str, they need to go through this mess: ```rust unsafe { std::str::from_utf8_unchecked(slice::from_ref(&(MAIN_SEPARATOR as u8))) } ``` This PR just re-exports an existing path separator str API.
Even more let_else adoptions Continuation of rust-lang#89933, rust-lang#91018, rust-lang#91481, rust-lang#93046, rust-lang#93590.
Add a `try_collect()` helper method to `Iterator` Implement `Iterator::try_collect()` as a helper around `Iterator::collect()` as discussed [here](https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/idea-fallible-iterator-mapping-with-try-map/15715/5?u=a.lafrance). First time contributor so definitely open to any feedback about my implementation! Specifically wondering if I should open a tracking issue for the unstable feature I introduced. As the main participant in the internals discussion: r? `@scottmcm`
Fix ICE when using Box<T, A> with pointer sized A Fixes rust-lang#78459 Note that using `Box<T, A>` with a more than pointer sized `A` or using a pointer sized `A` with a Box of a DST will produce a different ICE (rust-lang#92054) which is not fixed by this PR.
…Simulacrum Remove CFG_PLATFORM It seems to be unused and it is incorrect for arm/aarch64 anyway.
…p_fix, r=Manishearth Clippy: Don't lint `needless_borrow` in method receiver positions r? `@Manishearth` cc `@camsteffen` `@Jarcho` cc rust-lang/rust-clippy#8441 Let's get this fix in before the beta branching tomorrow.
@bors r+ rollup=never p=9 |
📌 Commit 39c1748 has been approved by |
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
Finished benchmarking commit (73a7423): comparison url. Summary: This benchmark run shows 13 relevant regressions 😿 to instruction counts.
If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf. Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this perf run, please indicate this with @rustbot label: +perf-regression |
@matthiaskrgr none of the rolled up PRs here seem remotely suspicious as to why there would be a performance regression. Any ideas? |
Yeah, the only thing that looks like it might have a very very slight performance impact is the ICE-fix but maybe it is just unlucky noise..? |
Successful merges:
try_collect()
helper method toIterator
#94041 (Add atry_collect()
helper method toIterator
)needless_borrow
in method receiver positions #94085 (Clippy: Don't lintneedless_borrow
in method receiver positions)Failed merges:
r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup