Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

remove find_use_placement #95194

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 15, 2022

Conversation

kckeiks
Copy link
Contributor

@kckeiks kckeiks commented Mar 22, 2022

A more robust solution to finding where to place use suggestions was added in #94584.
The algorithm uses the AST to find the span for the suggestion so we pass this span
down to the HIR during lowering and use it instead of calling find_use_placement

Fixes #94941

@rustbot rustbot added T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Mar 22, 2022
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @davidtwco

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Mar 22, 2022
@kckeiks
Copy link
Contributor Author

kckeiks commented Mar 22, 2022

r? @pnkfelix

@rust-highfive rust-highfive assigned pnkfelix and unassigned davidtwco Mar 22, 2022
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 31, 2022

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #90204) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

A more robust solution to finding where to place use suggestions was added.
The algorithm uses the AST to find the span for the suggestion so we pass this span
down to the HIR during lowering and use it.

Signed-off-by: Miguel Guarniz <mi9uel9@gmail.com>
@kckeiks kckeiks force-pushed the update-algo-in-find-use-placement branch from 38dfaf5 to 8c2353b Compare March 31, 2022 21:54
@cjgillot cjgillot assigned cjgillot and unassigned cjgillot Mar 31, 2022
@pnkfelix
Copy link
Member

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 14, 2022

📌 Commit 8c2353b has been approved by pnkfelix

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Apr 14, 2022
@pnkfelix
Copy link
Member

@bors rollup

Dylan-DPC added a commit to Dylan-DPC/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 14, 2022
…cement, r=pnkfelix

remove find_use_placement

A more robust solution to finding where to place use suggestions was added in rust-lang#94584.
The algorithm uses the AST to find the span for the suggestion so we pass this span
down to the HIR during lowering and use it instead of calling `find_use_placement`

Fixes rust-lang#94941
Dylan-DPC added a commit to Dylan-DPC/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 15, 2022
…cement, r=pnkfelix

remove find_use_placement

A more robust solution to finding where to place use suggestions was added in rust-lang#94584.
The algorithm uses the AST to find the span for the suggestion so we pass this span
down to the HIR during lowering and use it instead of calling `find_use_placement`

Fixes rust-lang#94941
RalfJung added a commit to RalfJung/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 15, 2022
…cement, r=pnkfelix

remove find_use_placement

A more robust solution to finding where to place use suggestions was added in rust-lang#94584.
The algorithm uses the AST to find the span for the suggestion so we pass this span
down to the HIR during lowering and use it instead of calling `find_use_placement`

Fixes rust-lang#94941
RalfJung added a commit to RalfJung/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 15, 2022
…cement, r=pnkfelix

remove find_use_placement

A more robust solution to finding where to place use suggestions was added in rust-lang#94584.
The algorithm uses the AST to find the span for the suggestion so we pass this span
down to the HIR during lowering and use it instead of calling `find_use_placement`

Fixes rust-lang#94941
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 15, 2022
Rollup of 11 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#94457 (Stabilize `derive_default_enum`)
 - rust-lang#94461 (Create (unstable) 2024 edition)
 - rust-lang#94849 (Check var scope if it exist)
 - rust-lang#95194 (remove find_use_placement)
 - rust-lang#95749 (only downgrade selection Error -> Ambiguous if type error is in predicate)
 - rust-lang#96026 (couple of clippy::complexity fixes)
 - rust-lang#96027 (remove function parameters only used in recursion)
 - rust-lang#96034 ([test] Add test cases of untested functions for BTreeSet )
 - rust-lang#96040 (Use u32 instead of i32 for futexes.)
 - rust-lang#96062 (docs: Update tests chapter for Termination stabilization)
 - rust-lang#96065 (Refactor: Use `format-args-capture` and remove unnecessary nested blocks in rustc_typeck)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit bdbf099 into rust-lang:master Apr 15, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.62.0 milestone Apr 15, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

cleanup: Unify find_use_placement approaches.
7 participants