-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add a test for issue #33172 #97085
Add a test for issue #33172 #97085
Conversation
📌 Commit 3ea686f has been approved by |
Add a test for issue rust-lang#33172 Adds a test confirming that rust-lang#33172 has been fixed. CDB has some surprising results as it looks like the supposedly unmangled static's symbol name is prefixed when it shouldn't be. r? ``@wesleywiser`` Closes rust-lang#33172
Failed in rollup: #98321 (comment) |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
@bors r+ |
Add a test for issue rust-lang#33172 Adds a test confirming that rust-lang#33172 has been fixed. CDB has some surprising results as it looks like the supposedly unmangled static's symbol name is prefixed when it shouldn't be. r? ```@wesleywiser``` Closes rust-lang#33172
Failed in rollup: #98480 (comment) |
Looks like this might be an issue with older gdb version?
We might need to restrict this to a newer version via the |
Co-authored-by: Wesley Wiser <wwiser@gmail.com>
@wesleywiser I pushed a change to set the min-version to higher than the default. Unfortunately, I'm having a hard time getting an old version of gdb working with my local test setup to test locally. It would be nice if we could run the debugger suite before it goes into a rollup and potentially fails. |
@bors r+ rollup=never |
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
Finished benchmarking commit (6bcf01a): comparison url. Instruction count
Max RSS (memory usage)Results
CyclesResults
If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf. @rustbot label: -perf-regression Footnotes |
I think it's safe to ignore this perf result since this PR only adds a debuginfo test and touches no other code so by definition, it couldn't have had an effect on compiler performance. |
Adds a test confirming that #33172 has been fixed.
CDB has some surprising results as it looks like the supposedly unmangled static's symbol name is prefixed when it shouldn't be.
r? @wesleywiser
Closes #33172