-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove the source archive functionality of ArchiveWriter #98098
Conversation
They only apply to the main source archive and their role can be fulfilled through the skip argument of add_archive too.
(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
@bors try @rust-timer queue |
Awaiting bors try build completion. @rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-perf |
⌛ Trying commit a0df21d127494fbe882058dd758e4584aba11c61 with merge dde83d14faf6a20c9da4f9a8f2e79c480cc99b31... |
Forgot to commit a change to cg_gcc. @bors try @rust-timer queue |
Awaiting bors try build completion. @rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-perf |
⌛ Trying commit 5a3ebc591652f4c49d36e37d8674e45874f06426 with merge 3113cc267866d900333eee92db6f39e681cb6760... |
☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions |
Queued 3113cc267866d900333eee92db6f39e681cb6760 with parent 872503d, future comparison URL. |
Finished benchmarking commit (3113cc267866d900333eee92db6f39e681cb6760): comparison url. Instruction count
Max RSS (memory usage)This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. CyclesResults
If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf. Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf. @bors rollup=never Footnotes |
📌 Commit 5a3ebc591652f4c49d36e37d8674e45874f06426 has been approved by |
⌛ Testing commit 5a3ebc591652f4c49d36e37d8674e45874f06426 with merge 2c30a9e214c3c81727926088e45382bc8c918de3... |
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
We now build archives through strictly additive means rather than taking an existing archive and potentially substracting parts.
That seems to have fixed it. Doing one final run with all reverts removed and then I can remove the debug commit. @bors try |
⌛ Trying commit bc36a08ea5184b5f93770271a3217817b78e9393 with merge 89977ebb6b9823d02a4b1c2b5a73840663cade92... |
☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions |
📌 Commit 7643f82 has been approved by |
Looks like macOS CI got stuck. Should I ask bors to retry? |
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
Looks like I was just too impatient. |
Finished benchmarking commit (dc80ca7): comparison url. Instruction count
Max RSS (memory usage)Results
CyclesResults
If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf. @rustbot label: -perf-regression Footnotes |
The updates required were related to the following changes: - Simplify memory ordering intrinsics - rust-lang/rust#97423 - once cell renamings - rust-lang/rust#98165 - Rename the ConstS::val field as kind - rust-lang/rust#97935 - Remove the source archive functionality of ArchiveWriter - rust-lang/rust#98098 - Use valtrees as the type-system representation for constant values - rust-lang/rust#96591
* Update toolchain to 2022-07-05 The updates required were related to the following changes: - Simplify memory ordering intrinsics - rust-lang/rust#97423 - once cell renamings - rust-lang/rust#98165 - Rename the ConstS::val field as kind - rust-lang/rust#97935 - Remove the source archive functionality of ArchiveWriter - rust-lang/rust#98098 - Use valtrees as the type-system representation for constant values - rust-lang/rust#96591 * Codegen unimplemented for unsupported constant slices See #1339 for more details. * Fix copyright check * Use codegen_option_span instead
…rister Remove the source archive functionality of ArchiveWriter We now build archives through strictly additive means rather than taking an existing archive and potentially substracting parts. This is simpler and makes it easier to swap out the archive writer in rust-lang#97485.
…rister Remove the source archive functionality of ArchiveWriter We now build archives through strictly additive means rather than taking an existing archive and potentially substracting parts. This is simpler and makes it easier to swap out the archive writer in rust-lang#97485.
We now build archives through strictly additive means rather than taking an existing archive and potentially substracting parts. This is simpler and makes it easier to swap out the archive writer in #97485.