Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Replace sort_modules_alphabetically boolean with enum #98685

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 30, 2022

Conversation

camelid
Copy link
Member

@camelid camelid commented Jun 29, 2022

This fixes the long-standing FIXME there and makes the code easier to
understand. The reference to modules in both the old and new names seems
potentially wrong since I believe it applies to all items.

r? @GuillaumeGomez

This fixes the long-standing FIXME there and makes the code easier to
understand. The reference to modules in both the old and new names seems
potentially wrong since I believe it applies to all items.
@rustbot rustbot added the T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Jun 29, 2022
@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jun 29, 2022
@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

GuillaumeGomez commented Jun 29, 2022

Thanks! The code is indeed much better. :)

r=me (with rollup) once CI pass.

@camelid
Copy link
Member Author

camelid commented Jun 29, 2022

@bors r=GuillaumeGomez rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 29, 2022

📌 Commit be0b112 has been approved by GuillaumeGomez

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jun 29, 2022
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 29, 2022
Replace `sort_modules_alphabetically` boolean with enum

This fixes the long-standing FIXME there and makes the code easier to
understand. The reference to modules in both the old and new names seems
potentially wrong since I believe it applies to all items.

r? `@GuillaumeGomez`
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 30, 2022
…askrgr

Rollup of 6 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#96727 (Make TAIT behave exactly like RPIT)
 - rust-lang#98681 (rustdoc-json: Make default value of blanket impl assoc types work)
 - rust-lang#98682 (add tests for ICE 94432)
 - rust-lang#98683 (add test for ice 68875)
 - rust-lang#98685 (Replace `sort_modules_alphabetically` boolean with enum)
 - rust-lang#98687 (add test for 47814)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 57c683a into rust-lang:master Jun 30, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.64.0 milestone Jun 30, 2022
@camelid camelid deleted the sorting-flag branch June 30, 2022 04:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants