-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
interpret: add From<&MplaceTy> for PlaceTy #98688
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rustbot
added
the
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
label
Jun 29, 2022
Some changes occurred to the CTFE / Miri engine cc @rust-lang/miri |
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
label
Jun 29, 2022
@bors r+ |
📌 Commit f60ec83 has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Jun 30, 2022
@bors rollup=always |
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 30, 2022
interpret: add From<&MplaceTy> for PlaceTy We have a similar instance for `&MPlaceTy` to `OpTy`. Also add the same for `&mut`. This avoids having to write `&(*place).into()`, which we have a few times here and at least twice in Miri (and it comes up again in my current patch). r? `@oli-obk`
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 30, 2022
interpret: add From<&MplaceTy> for PlaceTy We have a similar instance for `&MPlaceTy` to `OpTy`. Also add the same for `&mut`. This avoids having to write `&(*place).into()`, which we have a few times here and at least twice in Miri (and it comes up again in my current patch). r? ``@oli-obk``
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 1, 2022
…askrgr Rollup of 10 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#97629 ([core] add `Exclusive` to sync) - rust-lang#98503 (fix data race in thread::scope) - rust-lang#98670 (llvm-wrapper: adapt for LLVMConstExtractValue removal) - rust-lang#98671 (Fix source sidebar bugs) - rust-lang#98677 (For diagnostic information of Boolean, remind it as use the type: 'bool') - rust-lang#98684 (add test for 72793) - rust-lang#98688 (interpret: add From<&MplaceTy> for PlaceTy) - rust-lang#98695 (use "or pattern") - rust-lang#98709 (Remove unneeded methods declaration for old web browsers) - rust-lang#98717 (get rid of tidy 'unnecessarily ignored' warnings) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We have a similar instance for
&MPlaceTy
toOpTy
. Also add the same for&mut
.This avoids having to write
&(*place).into()
, which we have a few times here and at least twice in Miri (and it comes up again in my current patch).r? @oli-obk