-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
diagnostics: error messages when struct literals fail to parse #99030
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rustbot
added
the
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
label
Jul 7, 2022
(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
label
Jul 7, 2022
petrochenkov
added
S-waiting-on-author
Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Jul 12, 2022
Co-authored-by: Vadim Petrochenkov <vadim.petrochenkov@gmail.com>
notriddle
force-pushed
the
notriddle/field-recovery
branch
from
July 12, 2022 16:51
945198c
to
9fcb9c6
Compare
@rustbot ready |
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
and removed
S-waiting-on-author
Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author.
labels
Jul 12, 2022
@bors r+ |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Jul 13, 2022
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 13, 2022
Rollup of 5 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#98574 (Lower let-else in MIR) - rust-lang#99011 (`UnsafeCell` blocks niches inside its nested type from being available outside) - rust-lang#99030 (diagnostics: error messages when struct literals fail to parse) - rust-lang#99155 (Keep unstable target features for asm feature checking) - rust-lang#99199 (Refactor: remove an unnecessary `span_to_snippet`) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
flip1995
pushed a commit
to flip1995/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 18, 2022
Rollup of 5 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#98574 (Lower let-else in MIR) - rust-lang#99011 (`UnsafeCell` blocks niches inside its nested type from being available outside) - rust-lang#99030 (diagnostics: error messages when struct literals fail to parse) - rust-lang#99155 (Keep unstable target features for asm feature checking) - rust-lang#99199 (Refactor: remove an unnecessary `span_to_snippet`) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
JohnTitor
pushed a commit
to JohnTitor/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 26, 2022
Rollup of 5 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#98574 (Lower let-else in MIR) - rust-lang#99011 (`UnsafeCell` blocks niches inside its nested type from being available outside) - rust-lang#99030 (diagnostics: error messages when struct literals fail to parse) - rust-lang#99155 (Keep unstable target features for asm feature checking) - rust-lang#99199 (Refactor: remove an unnecessary `span_to_snippet`) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
If an expression is supplied where a field is expected, the parser can become convinced that it's a shorthand field syntax when it's not.
This PR addresses it by explicitly recording the permitted
:
token immediately after the identifier, and also adds a suggestion to insert the name of the field if it looks like a complex expression.Fixes #98917