-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Make some clean::Trait fields computation on demand #99598
Make some clean::Trait fields computation on demand #99598
Conversation
Some changes occurred in src/librustdoc/clean/types.rs cc @camelid |
@bors try @rust-timer queue |
Awaiting bors try build completion. @rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-perf |
⌛ Trying commit edb9add with merge 9cf9c1165517fc1279f15f86fa4e2364e0e52e8a... |
☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions |
Queued 9cf9c1165517fc1279f15f86fa4e2364e0e52e8a with parent e7a9c11, future comparison URL. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
r=me if it's not a perf regression
Finished benchmarking commit (9cf9c1165517fc1279f15f86fa4e2364e0e52e8a): comparison url. Instruction countThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Max RSS (memory usage)Results
CyclesResults
If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf. Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf. @bors rollup=never Footnotes |
@bors r+ |
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
Finished benchmarking commit (ffa7733): comparison url. Instruction countThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Max RSS (memory usage)Results
CyclesResults
If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf. @rustbot label: -perf-regression Footnotes |
r? @notriddle