Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

get rid of RefCell in TransitiveRelation #99702

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Aug 22, 2022

Conversation

SparrowLii
Copy link
Member

This is one of the jobs in Pending refactorings in #48685. The parallel-compiler's work has been suspended for quite some time, but I think I can pick it up gradually. I think this PR should be a start.

Regarding the refactoring of TransitiveRelation, @nikomatsakis has proposed two(three?) schemes. In order to satisfy both compilation efficiency and robustness, I think adding the freeze method may be the best solution, although it requires relatively more code changes.

@rustbot rustbot added the T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Jul 25, 2022
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @petrochenkov

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jul 25, 2022
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@SparrowLii SparrowLii force-pushed the transtive_relation branch 2 times, most recently from d9f45cc to 1a665aa Compare July 25, 2022 03:06
@petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor

I'm not familiar with this area.
r? rust-lang/compiler

@bors

This comment was marked as resolved.

@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor

oli-obk commented Jul 28, 2022

please rebase so we can run a perf test on this.

cc @lcnr this may conflict with your other refactorings

@lcnr
Copy link
Contributor

lcnr commented Jul 28, 2022

I intend to add implied bounds to the param env so OutlivesEnvironment::with_implied_bounds will should be unnecessary in a few weeks/months. Can't think of anything else I am working on which will conflict with this in the near future.

@SparrowLii SparrowLii force-pushed the transtive_relation branch from 1a665aa to 53dc99a Compare July 29, 2022 07:10
@SparrowLii
Copy link
Member Author

I add implied_bounds_tys method to outlives_bounds::InferCtxtExt to collect all the implied_bounds, then add with_bounds to OutlivesEnvironment to build at once. In this case we don't need regionck mod in typeck anymore.

@oli-obk I rebased the PR so we can do a perf run now.

@lqd
Copy link
Member

lqd commented Jul 29, 2022

@bors try @rust-timer queue

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Awaiting bors try build completion.

@rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-perf

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Jul 29, 2022
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 29, 2022

⌛ Trying commit 53dc99a465b159eb13c3ac2ecd2924dfe65beab3 with merge d4e9c7f1d17ad93a14e06c762e2177954744128a...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 29, 2022

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: d4e9c7f1d17ad93a14e06c762e2177954744128a (d4e9c7f1d17ad93a14e06c762e2177954744128a)

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Queued d4e9c7f1d17ad93a14e06c762e2177954744128a with parent ea6ab1b, future comparison URL.

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (d4e9c7f1d17ad93a14e06c762e2177954744128a): comparison url.

Instruction count

  • Primary benchmarks: 😿 relevant regressions found
  • Secondary benchmarks: mixed results
mean1 max count2
Regressions 😿
(primary)
0.3% 0.3% 2
Regressions 😿
(secondary)
0.2% 0.3% 3
Improvements 🎉
(primary)
N/A N/A 0
Improvements 🎉
(secondary)
-0.2% -0.2% 1
All 😿🎉 (primary) 0.3% 0.3% 2

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results
  • Primary benchmarks: 🎉 relevant improvement found
  • Secondary benchmarks: 😿 relevant regressions found
mean1 max count2
Regressions 😿
(primary)
N/A N/A 0
Regressions 😿
(secondary)
2.6% 2.6% 2
Improvements 🎉
(primary)
-2.5% -2.5% 1
Improvements 🎉
(secondary)
N/A N/A 0
All 😿🎉 (primary) -2.5% -2.5% 1

Cycles

Results
  • Primary benchmarks: 😿 relevant regression found
  • Secondary benchmarks: no relevant changes found
mean1 max count2
Regressions 😿
(primary)
10.4% 10.4% 1
Regressions 😿
(secondary)
N/A N/A 0
Improvements 🎉
(primary)
N/A N/A 0
Improvements 🎉
(secondary)
N/A N/A 0
All 😿🎉 (primary) 10.4% 10.4% 1

If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf.

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf.

Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this try perf run, please indicate this with @rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged along with sufficient written justification. If you cannot justify the regressions please fix the regressions and do another perf run. If the next run shows neutral or positive results, the label will be automatically removed.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-review -S-waiting-on-perf +perf-regression

Footnotes

  1. the arithmetic mean of the percent change 2 3

  2. number of relevant changes 2 3

@rustbot rustbot added perf-regression Performance regression. and removed S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. labels Jul 29, 2022
@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor

oli-obk commented Jul 29, 2022

Small perf changes:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ir        
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1,636,568  PROGRAM TOTALS

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ir          file:function
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 5,438,542  ???:rustc_borrowck::type_check::free_region_relations::create
-3,075,341  ???:<rustc_borrowck::region_infer::RegionInferenceContext>::solve
 1,352,946  ???:<rustc_infer::infer::outlives::env::OutlivesEnvironment>::with_bounds::<alloc::boxed::Box<dyn core::iter::traits::iterator::Iterator<Item = rustc_middle::traits::query::OutlivesBound>>>
-1,081,605  ???:<alloc::rc::Rc<rustc_middle::traits::ObligationCauseCode> as core::ops::drop::Drop>::drop
 1,072,968  ???:<rustc_mir_dataflow::impls::MaybeInitializedPlaces as rustc_mir_dataflow::framework::Analysis>::into_engine
-1,068,823  ???:<rustc_mir_dataflow::framework::engine::Engine<rustc_mir_dataflow::impls::MaybeInitializedPlaces>>::new_gen_kill
 1,037,740  ???:<rustc_infer::infer::InferCtxtBuilder>::enter::<core::result::Result<alloc::vec::Vec<rustc_middle::ty::Predicate>, rustc_errors::ErrorGuaranteed>, rustc_trait_selection::traits::do_normalize_predicates::{closure
   887,900  ???:<rustc_mir_dataflow::impls::MaybeUninitializedPlaces as rustc_mir_dataflow::framework::Analysis>::into_engine
   881,271  ???:<rustc_mir_dataflow::impls::EverInitializedPlaces as rustc_mir_dataflow::framework::Analysis>::into_engine
   870,077  ???:<hashbrown::raw::RawTable<(rustc_span::def_id::DefId, (core::option::Option<rustc_middle::ty::Ty>, rustc_query_system::dep_graph::graph::DepNodeIndex))>>::reserve_rehash::<hashbrown::map::make_hasher<rustc_span::def_id::DefId, rustc_span::def_id::DefId, (core::option::Option<rustc_middle::ty::Ty>, rustc_query_system::dep_graph::graph::DepNodeIndex), core::hash::BuildHasherDefault<rustc_hash::FxHasher>>::{closure
  -869,973  ???:<hashbrown::raw::RawTable<(rustc_span::def_id::DefId, (rustc_middle::ty::adt::AdtDef, rustc_query_system::dep_graph::graph::DepNodeIndex))>>::reserve_rehash::<hashbrown::map::make_hasher<rustc_span::def_id::DefId, rustc_span::def_id::DefId, (rustc_middle::ty::adt::AdtDef, rustc_query_system::dep_graph::graph::DepNodeIndex), core::hash::BuildHasherDefault<rustc_hash::FxHasher>>::{closure
  -868,377  ???:<rustc_mir_dataflow::framework::engine::Engine<rustc_mir_dataflow::impls::EverInitializedPlaces>>::new_gen_kill
  -857,624  ???:<rustc_mir_dataflow::framework::engine::Engine<rustc_mir_dataflow::impls::MaybeUninitializedPlaces>>::new_gen_kill
  -708,799  ???:<rustc_infer::infer::outlives::env::OutlivesEnvironment as rustc_typeck::check::regionck::OutlivesEnvironmentExt>::add_implied_bounds
  -700,204  ???:<rustc_infer::infer::outlives::env::OutlivesEnvironment>::new
   662,528  ???:<rustc_infer::infer::outlives::env::OutlivesEnvironment>::builder

mostly inlining changes (new_gen_kill -> into_engine)

@SparrowLii
Copy link
Member Author

mostly inlining changes (new_gen_kill -> into_engine)

I add inline on the into_engine func, hoping this can help

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Awaiting bors try build completion.

@rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-perf

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Aug 1, 2022
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 1, 2022

⌛ Trying commit d16796047523a6a17de08dcb739604f402526fb8 with merge e4ad27f1e1bd50aac91b50bd072257da970f393b...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 1, 2022

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: e4ad27f1e1bd50aac91b50bd072257da970f393b (e4ad27f1e1bd50aac91b50bd072257da970f393b)

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Queued e4ad27f1e1bd50aac91b50bd072257da970f393b with parent 34805f3, future comparison URL.

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (e4ad27f1e1bd50aac91b50bd072257da970f393b): comparison url.

Instruction count

  • Primary benchmarks: no relevant changes found
  • Secondary benchmarks: 😿 relevant regression found
mean1 max count2
Regressions 😿
(primary)
N/A N/A 0
Regressions 😿
(secondary)
0.2% 0.2% 1
Improvements 🎉
(primary)
N/A N/A 0
Improvements 🎉
(secondary)
N/A N/A 0
All 😿🎉 (primary) N/A N/A 0

Max RSS (memory usage)

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Cycles

Results
  • Primary benchmarks: 😿 relevant regression found
  • Secondary benchmarks: no relevant changes found
mean1 max count2
Regressions 😿
(primary)
2.3% 2.3% 1
Regressions 😿
(secondary)
N/A N/A 0
Improvements 🎉
(primary)
N/A N/A 0
Improvements 🎉
(secondary)
N/A N/A 0
All 😿🎉 (primary) 2.3% 2.3% 1

If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf.

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-review -S-waiting-on-perf -perf-regression

Footnotes

  1. the arithmetic mean of the percent change 2

  2. number of relevant changes 2

@rustbot rustbot removed S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. perf-regression Performance regression. labels Aug 1, 2022
@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor

oli-obk commented Aug 22, 2022

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 22, 2022

📌 Commit a01ac5a has been approved by oli-obk

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Aug 22, 2022
@SparrowLii
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks for reviewing!

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 22, 2022

⌛ Testing commit a01ac5a with merge a8a33cf...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 22, 2022

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: oli-obk
Pushing a8a33cf to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Aug 22, 2022
@bors bors merged commit a8a33cf into rust-lang:master Aug 22, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.65.0 milestone Aug 22, 2022
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (a8a33cf): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean1 range count2
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
1.9% [1.2%, 2.4%] 3
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-2.4% [-2.7%, -2.1%] 2
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean1 range count2
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-4.5% [-5.2%, -3.9%] 2
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Footnotes

  1. the arithmetic mean of the percent change 2

  2. number of relevant changes 2

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.