Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Change CI to handle openblas MSRV compatibility #1456

Closed
wants to merge 11 commits into from

Conversation

akern40
Copy link
Collaborator

@akern40 akern40 commented Nov 29, 2024

Changes to BLIS for testing MSRV, since openblas is currently MSRV 1.67 and incompatible with ndarray's MSRV of 1.64

@akern40 akern40 closed this Nov 29, 2024
@akern40 akern40 reopened this Nov 29, 2024

Although ``ndarray`` currently maintains an MSRV of 1.64.0, this is separate from the MSRV (either stated or real) of the various BLAS providers.
As of the time of writing, ``openblas`` currently supports MSRV of 1.67.0.
So, while ``ndarray`` and ``openblas-src`` are compatible, they can only work together with toolchains 1.67.0 or above.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I wonder if ndarray can just use an older blas-src and older openblas-src for earlier Rust. I think that's the case, but I'm not sure we need to use it in CI. Thanks for fixing this

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No problem - I'll try seeing if there's an older openblas-src that we can use and add it to the documentation. But this all was the motivation for #1455, since I was wondering whether we want to bump to 1.67 (in order to make it easier for users to use BLAS)

@akern40
Copy link
Collaborator Author

akern40 commented Nov 30, 2024

Merged as part of #1458

@akern40 akern40 deleted the blis-msrv branch November 30, 2024 18:09
@akern40 akern40 mentioned this pull request Dec 13, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants