-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 568
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
debian package #474
Comments
Hi Josch, that sounds great! As I'm not seeing the dependencies on that wishlist, I'm not sure how many extra dependencies you need to package to make that happen, but if it helps, maybe there is some optimization we can do to simplify things (looking at #423 which is a no-brainer, but maybe others should also be checked). Please let me know if we can be of any help :-) |
Disabling |
I just uploaded the package to experimental and it's now waiting to have its copyright information reviewed in the NEW queue: https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/python-miio_0.4.4-1.html I split the There is still some trouble with the dependency on Lastly, here is the relevant part of the copyright file I wrote for
I only spotted |
Unfortunately I cannot help you with there. The construct undergo earlier a lot of breaking changes, so depending on how widely the library is used by ironic-inspector, porting it may be a bit more involved than in the case of this library.
Looks like the package I've been uploading contains local files that are not supposed to be there, this concerns the Other than that I think you are on point with the copyrights. I create a couple of PRs to make packaging easier. I'm also contemplating on dropping the pytz dependency or moving it as an optional one -- it is only used in a single place for a non-common operation. |
Quoting Teemu R. (2019-02-05 14:04:16)
I create a couple of PRs to make packaging easier. I'm also contemplating on
dropping the pytz dependency or moving it as an optional one -- it is only
used in a single place for a non-common operation.
As far as Debian is concerned the dependency on pytz is not relevant because
it's already packaged and thus doesn't cause any concern. I don't know if pytz
is not packaged in other distributions?
|
python-miio is no in Debian experimental: https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/python-miio To be moved to unstable (and thus get a chance to be part of the next Debian release) I first need to solve the issue with I got one suggestion from the copyright review: If Sebastian Muszynski is indeed also copyright holder (as listed in the copyright snipped I posted above) then this information should also be reflected somewhere in the upstream (i.e. your) codebase and not only in Debian. |
Nice to hear it's progressing! Yes, we definitely should add a contributors / authors file, according to |
Hi,
I just opened the following Debian ITP https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=921345 and already have some proof-of-concept packaging done. I just wanted to announce here, that I plan to upload python-miio to Debian and maintain it there. As far as I can see nobody else packaged it yet for Debian or Ubuntu? This would avoid having to use virtualenv on Debian and derivatives.
Thanks!
cheers, josch
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: