-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 491
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
expose building documentation for user modules not in the Sage library #6389
Comments
comment:1
This used to work, but no longer
|
comment:3
The line
in |
comment:5
Replying to @jhpalmieri:
This assert is in |
comment:6
Replying to @mkoeppe:
Ignore them? Or at least ignore references to citations in the Sage library: I think it should treat the single file as being unconnected to the Sage library. |
comment:9
See also #21841 -- per that ticket, I think that if Sage's docbuild facilities are made available to third-party code (as I think it should be) then either it should be moved into the sage library itself (i.e. |
comment:10
I don't fully understand how citations are handled, but would it not be desirable for third-party docs to either have their own citation list, or to be able to point to citations in Sage's docs (if available)? |
It would be neat to be able to do:
sage -docbuild foo.py
for a single file not in the library.
See also:
CC: @mkoeppe @jdemeyer @vbraun @fchapoton @williamstein @dimpase @nthiery @hivert @embray
Component: documentation
Keywords: sphinx
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/6389
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: