♻️ Favor member_ids_ssim over file_set_ids_ssim #929
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
For several years Hyrax has index
file_set_ids_ssim
as a verbatim copy ofmember_ids_ssim
. With Hyrax 5, we're removing thefile_set_ids_ssim
from indexing; And given that it's been a verbatim copy since 2017 or so, it's relatively safe to assume that we can favor, without application impact, themember_ids_ssim
over thefile_set_ids_ssim
value.It would be nice to have
file_set_ids_ssim
but not as a verbatim copy. Someday, we might have nice things.In the case of Bulkrax, given that we don't require Hyrax, we need to have a configurable option as well as one that is a consistent fallback to what came before.
Related to: