Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add the option to extract more sophisticated meshes when using Gmsh #282

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 4, 2023

Conversation

sblauth
Copy link
Owner

@sblauth sblauth commented Aug 4, 2023

Closes #281

@sblauth sblauth added this to the v2.1 milestone Aug 4, 2023
@sblauth sblauth self-assigned this Aug 4, 2023
@sblauth sblauth enabled auto-merge August 4, 2023 12:27
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 4, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #282 (6e631c6) into main (ff0efab) will decrease coverage by 0.04%.
The diff coverage is 80.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #282      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   92.93%   92.89%   -0.04%     
==========================================
  Files          84       84              
  Lines        6518     6522       +4     
==========================================
+ Hits         6057     6058       +1     
- Misses        461      464       +3     
Files Changed Coverage Δ
cashocs/_cli/_extract_mesh.py 30.43% <0.00%> (-2.90%) ⬇️
cashocs/io/mesh.py 93.72% <92.31%> (-0.46%) ⬇️

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

@sblauth sblauth merged commit 7c7be4a into main Aug 4, 2023
20 checks passed
@sblauth sblauth deleted the development/extract_with_gmsh branch August 4, 2023 12:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Development] Use builtin write_mesh functionality for extract mesh
1 participant