Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix #19789: Merge same TypeParamRef in orDominator #20090

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 10, 2024

Conversation

noti0na1
Copy link
Member

@noti0na1 noti0na1 commented Apr 4, 2024

Fix #19789

Merge refined or applied types if they share the same TypeParamRef as tycon in orDominator.

Copy link
Contributor

@odersky odersky left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this can be optimized by adding a first clause

 if tp1 eq tp2 then tp1

Also, instead of comparing TypeParamRefs directly we could just do it like this:

case tp1: TypeParamRef if tp1 == tp2 => tp1

Note the first test might still need the second, since hash-consing is not 100% assured (e.g. we might get copies after a table overflow). So exploiting hash consing should always be an optimization only.

@odersky odersky assigned noti0na1 and unassigned odersky Apr 7, 2024
@odersky odersky merged commit 9b3495a into scala:main Apr 10, 2024
19 checks passed
@odersky odersky deleted the fix-19789 branch April 10, 2024 20:48
@Kordyjan Kordyjan added this to the 3.5.0 milestone May 10, 2024
WojciechMazur added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 5, 2024
…21056)

Backports #20090 to the LTS branch.

PR submitted by the release tooling.
[skip ci]
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

AssertionError: Failure to join alternatives
3 participants