Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix #452, use flexible scala dialect. #453

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 24, 2017
Merged

Conversation

olafurpg
Copy link
Contributor

Scalafmt uses the same dialect with the only difference that we don't
treat inline as a keyword here (I think that was a premature choice in
scalafmt)

Scalafmt uses the same dialect with the only difference that we don't
treat `inline` as a keyword here (I think that was a premature choice in
scalafmt)
@MasseGuillaume
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM. Why we have a default dialect?

@olafurpg
Copy link
Contributor Author

The default dialect was primarily used for syntactic rules but we also use them for semantic rules since typically you just care about parsing as mucha s possible.

@olafurpg olafurpg merged commit ffe94e4 into scalacenter:master Nov 24, 2017
@olafurpg olafurpg deleted the 212 branch November 24, 2017 12:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants