We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
is_standard_normal
Relax confidence level? Or could seed it.
Weirdly only seems flaky on Python 3.8.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
f962322
fix #53 again, sigh
0daa6c9
Argh, still flaky. Clearly this test is not as robust as I hoped, maybe need to use something other than (or in addition to?) K-S.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Temporarily fixed this byusing default_rng with a seed -- but would rather have a test that a decent sample passes on.
default_rng
Reduce test flakiness, but not func flakiness, see #53
635fa48
Much better now but failed again on 3.9 here https://github.com/scienxlab/redflag/actions/runs/6385283773
No branches or pull requests
Relax confidence level? Or could seed it.
Weirdly only seems flaky on Python 3.8.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: