Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Overlapping pins look weird #22

Open
dobesv opened this issue Feb 27, 2015 · 13 comments
Open

Overlapping pins look weird #22

dobesv opened this issue Feb 27, 2015 · 13 comments

Comments

@dobesv
Copy link

dobesv commented Feb 27, 2015

When two markers overlap, the background shapes of the pins overlap and then the labels overlap separately on top of the background shape. So, it looks a bit weird. Any ideas how I could get around this?

@dobesv
Copy link
Author

dobesv commented Feb 27, 2015

bus

@dobesv
Copy link
Author

dobesv commented Feb 27, 2015

You can see how the bus icon and the flag icon are overlapping.

@jakeholland
Copy link

I have the same issue. Did you figure out anything to get it to look cleaner?

@dobesv
Copy link
Author

dobesv commented Jul 3, 2015

No, I just let it be.

On Thu, Jul 2, 2015, 1:20 PM Jacob Holland notifications@github.com wrote:

I have the same issue. Did you figure out anything to get it to look
cleaner?


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#22 (comment)
.

@dreadpiratebrown
Copy link

I am having this issue, too. From the inspector, I can see that the pins are in a layer that is z-index: 1, and the labels are separate layer that is z-index: 4. I don't think these can be resolved since they are in completely different and overlapping containers. I like this icon set but unless the z-index issue can be fixed, I can't use it for my application.

@xpluscal
Copy link

+1

@nOzwald
Copy link

nOzwald commented Jun 1, 2016

Any work around for this yet? Everything works brilliantly except for this issue. Have a map with a high density of markers and when zoomed out it looks terrible.

@xpluscal
Copy link

+!

@jdanino
Copy link

jdanino commented Aug 31, 2016

Same issue here.. this is quite a deal breaker for an otherwise pretty cool library

@eriknyk
Copy link

eriknyk commented Sep 9, 2016

any update for this issue?

@franciscolourenco
Copy link

@eriknyk
Copy link

eriknyk commented Dec 5, 2016

Seems this project is not not maintained any more, any alternative for it? #60

@robsilva
Copy link

robsilva commented May 8, 2018

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

9 participants