-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 585
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove simd-json support #2735
Merged
Merged
Remove simd-json support #2735
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
github-actions
bot
added
model
Related to the `model` module.
builder
Related to the `builder` module.
cache
Related to the `cache`-feature.
http
Related to the `http` module.
gateway
Related to the `gateway` module.
examples
Related to Serenity's examples.
ci
Related to the continuous integration.
labels
Jan 23, 2024
GnomedDev
force-pushed
the
remove-simd-json
branch
2 times, most recently
from
January 23, 2024 22:41
2d1f97f
to
4dec394
Compare
GnomedDev
force-pushed
the
remove-simd-json
branch
from
January 24, 2024 18:46
4dec394
to
fe3334d
Compare
arqunis
added
enhancement
An improvement to Serenity.
breaking change
The public API is changed, resulting in miscompilations or unexpected new behaviour for users
dependencies
Related to Serenity dependencies.
labels
Jan 24, 2024
arqunis
approved these changes
Jan 24, 2024
GnomedDev
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 9, 2024
`simd-json` is not a performance improvement for Serenity. It has a ton of sketchy uses of `unsafe`, increases the maintenance burden, and leads to Serenity containing a json compatibility layer(!). This commit removes all that, although a faster json decoding implementation is on the table in the future if the compatibility layer is kept out of tree and it is measurably faster for Serenity's usecase.
Erk-
added a commit
to Erk-/songbird
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 26, 2024
This mirrors the serenity pr serenity-rs/serenity#2735.
Erk-
added a commit
to Erk-/songbird
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 27, 2024
This mirrors the serenity pr serenity-rs/serenity#2735.
Erk-
added a commit
to Erk-/songbird
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 29, 2024
This mirrors the serenity pr serenity-rs/serenity#2735.
Erk-
added a commit
to serenity-rs/songbird
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 29, 2024
This mirrors the serenity pr serenity-rs/serenity#2735.
arqunis
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 1, 2024
`simd-json` is not a performance improvement for Serenity. It has a ton of sketchy uses of `unsafe`, increases the maintenance burden, and leads to Serenity containing a json compatibility layer(!). This commit removes all that, although a faster json decoding implementation is on the table in the future if the compatibility layer is kept out of tree and it is measurably faster for Serenity's usecase.
FelixMcFelix
pushed a commit
to FelixMcFelix/songbird
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 4, 2024
This mirrors the serenity pr serenity-rs/serenity#2735.
GnomedDev
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 10, 2024
`simd-json` is not a performance improvement for Serenity. It has a ton of sketchy uses of `unsafe`, increases the maintenance burden, and leads to Serenity containing a json compatibility layer(!). This commit removes all that, although a faster json decoding implementation is on the table in the future if the compatibility layer is kept out of tree and it is measurably faster for Serenity's usecase.
GnomedDev
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 11, 2024
`simd-json` is not a performance improvement for Serenity. It has a ton of sketchy uses of `unsafe`, increases the maintenance burden, and leads to Serenity containing a json compatibility layer(!). This commit removes all that, although a faster json decoding implementation is on the table in the future if the compatibility layer is kept out of tree and it is measurably faster for Serenity's usecase.
GnomedDev
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 11, 2024
`simd-json` is not a performance improvement for Serenity. It has a ton of sketchy uses of `unsafe`, increases the maintenance burden, and leads to Serenity containing a json compatibility layer(!). This commit removes all that, although a faster json decoding implementation is on the table in the future if the compatibility layer is kept out of tree and it is measurably faster for Serenity's usecase.
GnomedDev
added a commit
to GnomedDev/serenity
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 13, 2024
`simd-json` is not a performance improvement for Serenity. It has a ton of sketchy uses of `unsafe`, increases the maintenance burden, and leads to Serenity containing a json compatibility layer(!). This commit removes all that, although a faster json decoding implementation is on the table in the future if the compatibility layer is kept out of tree and it is measurably faster for Serenity's usecase.
GnomedDev
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 13, 2024
`simd-json` is not a performance improvement for Serenity. It has a ton of sketchy uses of `unsafe`, increases the maintenance burden, and leads to Serenity containing a json compatibility layer(!). This commit removes all that, although a faster json decoding implementation is on the table in the future if the compatibility layer is kept out of tree and it is measurably faster for Serenity's usecase.
GnomedDev
added a commit
to GnomedDev/serenity
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 19, 2024
`simd-json` is not a performance improvement for Serenity. It has a ton of sketchy uses of `unsafe`, increases the maintenance burden, and leads to Serenity containing a json compatibility layer(!). This commit removes all that, although a faster json decoding implementation is on the table in the future if the compatibility layer is kept out of tree and it is measurably faster for Serenity's usecase.
GnomedDev
added a commit
to GnomedDev/serenity
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 19, 2024
`simd-json` is not a performance improvement for Serenity. It has a ton of sketchy uses of `unsafe`, increases the maintenance burden, and leads to Serenity containing a json compatibility layer(!). This commit removes all that, although a faster json decoding implementation is on the table in the future if the compatibility layer is kept out of tree and it is measurably faster for Serenity's usecase.
GnomedDev
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 21, 2024
`simd-json` is not a performance improvement for Serenity. It has a ton of sketchy uses of `unsafe`, increases the maintenance burden, and leads to Serenity containing a json compatibility layer(!). This commit removes all that, although a faster json decoding implementation is on the table in the future if the compatibility layer is kept out of tree and it is measurably faster for Serenity's usecase.
GnomedDev
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 25, 2024
`simd-json` is not a performance improvement for Serenity. It has a ton of sketchy uses of `unsafe`, increases the maintenance burden, and leads to Serenity containing a json compatibility layer(!). This commit removes all that, although a faster json decoding implementation is on the table in the future if the compatibility layer is kept out of tree and it is measurably faster for Serenity's usecase.
GnomedDev
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 25, 2024
`simd-json` is not a performance improvement for Serenity. It has a ton of sketchy uses of `unsafe`, increases the maintenance burden, and leads to Serenity containing a json compatibility layer(!). This commit removes all that, although a faster json decoding implementation is on the table in the future if the compatibility layer is kept out of tree and it is measurably faster for Serenity's usecase.
GnomedDev
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 29, 2024
`simd-json` is not a performance improvement for Serenity. It has a ton of sketchy uses of `unsafe`, increases the maintenance burden, and leads to Serenity containing a json compatibility layer(!). This commit removes all that, although a faster json decoding implementation is on the table in the future if the compatibility layer is kept out of tree and it is measurably faster for Serenity's usecase.
GnomedDev
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 31, 2024
`simd-json` is not a performance improvement for Serenity. It has a ton of sketchy uses of `unsafe`, increases the maintenance burden, and leads to Serenity containing a json compatibility layer(!). This commit removes all that, although a faster json decoding implementation is on the table in the future if the compatibility layer is kept out of tree and it is measurably faster for Serenity's usecase.
GnomedDev
added a commit
to GnomedDev/serenity
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 31, 2024
`simd-json` is not a performance improvement for Serenity. It has a ton of sketchy uses of `unsafe`, increases the maintenance burden, and leads to Serenity containing a json compatibility layer(!). This commit removes all that, although a faster json decoding implementation is on the table in the future if the compatibility layer is kept out of tree and it is measurably faster for Serenity's usecase.
GnomedDev
added a commit
to GnomedDev/serenity
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 1, 2024
`simd-json` is not a performance improvement for Serenity. It has a ton of sketchy uses of `unsafe`, increases the maintenance burden, and leads to Serenity containing a json compatibility layer(!). This commit removes all that, although a faster json decoding implementation is on the table in the future if the compatibility layer is kept out of tree and it is measurably faster for Serenity's usecase.
GnomedDev
added a commit
to GnomedDev/serenity
that referenced
this pull request
May 14, 2024
`simd-json` is not a performance improvement for Serenity. It has a ton of sketchy uses of `unsafe`, increases the maintenance burden, and leads to Serenity containing a json compatibility layer(!). This commit removes all that, although a faster json decoding implementation is on the table in the future if the compatibility layer is kept out of tree and it is measurably faster for Serenity's usecase.
GnomedDev
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 14, 2024
`simd-json` is not a performance improvement for Serenity. It has a ton of sketchy uses of `unsafe`, increases the maintenance burden, and leads to Serenity containing a json compatibility layer(!). This commit removes all that, although a faster json decoding implementation is on the table in the future if the compatibility layer is kept out of tree and it is measurably faster for Serenity's usecase.
GnomedDev
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 23, 2024
`simd-json` is not a performance improvement for Serenity. It has a ton of sketchy uses of `unsafe`, increases the maintenance burden, and leads to Serenity containing a json compatibility layer(!). This commit removes all that, although a faster json decoding implementation is on the table in the future if the compatibility layer is kept out of tree and it is measurably faster for Serenity's usecase.
GnomedDev
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 28, 2024
`simd-json` is not a performance improvement for Serenity. It has a ton of sketchy uses of `unsafe`, increases the maintenance burden, and leads to Serenity containing a json compatibility layer(!). This commit removes all that, although a faster json decoding implementation is on the table in the future if the compatibility layer is kept out of tree and it is measurably faster for Serenity's usecase.
GnomedDev
added a commit
to GnomedDev/serenity
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 9, 2024
`simd-json` is not a performance improvement for Serenity. It has a ton of sketchy uses of `unsafe`, increases the maintenance burden, and leads to Serenity containing a json compatibility layer(!). This commit removes all that, although a faster json decoding implementation is on the table in the future if the compatibility layer is kept out of tree and it is measurably faster for Serenity's usecase.
GnomedDev
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 22, 2024
`simd-json` is not a performance improvement for Serenity. It has a ton of sketchy uses of `unsafe`, increases the maintenance burden, and leads to Serenity containing a json compatibility layer(!). This commit removes all that, although a faster json decoding implementation is on the table in the future if the compatibility layer is kept out of tree and it is measurably faster for Serenity's usecase.
GnomedDev
added a commit
to GnomedDev/serenity
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 22, 2024
`simd-json` is not a performance improvement for Serenity. It has a ton of sketchy uses of `unsafe`, increases the maintenance burden, and leads to Serenity containing a json compatibility layer(!). This commit removes all that, although a faster json decoding implementation is on the table in the future if the compatibility layer is kept out of tree and it is measurably faster for Serenity's usecase.
mkrasnitski
pushed a commit
to mkrasnitski/serenity
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 29, 2024
`simd-json` is not a performance improvement for Serenity. It has a ton of sketchy uses of `unsafe`, increases the maintenance burden, and leads to Serenity containing a json compatibility layer(!). This commit removes all that, although a faster json decoding implementation is on the table in the future if the compatibility layer is kept out of tree and it is measurably faster for Serenity's usecase.
mkrasnitski
pushed a commit
to mkrasnitski/serenity
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 30, 2024
`simd-json` is not a performance improvement for Serenity. It has a ton of sketchy uses of `unsafe`, increases the maintenance burden, and leads to Serenity containing a json compatibility layer(!). This commit removes all that, although a faster json decoding implementation is on the table in the future if the compatibility layer is kept out of tree and it is measurably faster for Serenity's usecase.
tazz4843
pushed a commit
to tazz4843/songbird
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 4, 2024
This mirrors the serenity pr serenity-rs/serenity#2735.
GnomedDev
pushed a commit
to serenity-rs/songbird
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 5, 2024
This mirrors the serenity pr serenity-rs/serenity#2735.
GnomedDev
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 16, 2024
`simd-json` is not a performance improvement for Serenity. It has a ton of sketchy uses of `unsafe`, increases the maintenance burden, and leads to Serenity containing a json compatibility layer(!). This commit removes all that, although a faster json decoding implementation is on the table in the future if the compatibility layer is kept out of tree and it is measurably faster for Serenity's usecase.
GnomedDev
pushed a commit
to GnomedDev/songbird
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 7, 2024
This mirrors the serenity pr serenity-rs/serenity#2735.
GnomedDev
pushed a commit
to serenity-rs/songbird
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 9, 2024
This mirrors the serenity pr serenity-rs/serenity#2735.
GnomedDev
added a commit
to GnomedDev/serenity
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 7, 2024
`simd-json` is not a performance improvement for Serenity. It has a ton of sketchy uses of `unsafe`, increases the maintenance burden, and leads to Serenity containing a json compatibility layer(!). This commit removes all that, although a faster json decoding implementation is on the table in the future if the compatibility layer is kept out of tree and it is measurably faster for Serenity's usecase.
GnomedDev
added a commit
to GnomedDev/serenity
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 20, 2024
`simd-json` is not a performance improvement for Serenity. It has a ton of sketchy uses of `unsafe`, increases the maintenance burden, and leads to Serenity containing a json compatibility layer(!). This commit removes all that, although a faster json decoding implementation is on the table in the future if the compatibility layer is kept out of tree and it is measurably faster for Serenity's usecase.
GnomedDev
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 20, 2024
`simd-json` is not a performance improvement for Serenity. It has a ton of sketchy uses of `unsafe`, increases the maintenance burden, and leads to Serenity containing a json compatibility layer(!). This commit removes all that, although a faster json decoding implementation is on the table in the future if the compatibility layer is kept out of tree and it is measurably faster for Serenity's usecase.
FelixMcFelix
pushed a commit
to serenity-rs/songbird
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 11, 2024
This mirrors the serenity pr serenity-rs/serenity#2735.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
breaking change
The public API is changed, resulting in miscompilations or unexpected new behaviour for users
builder
Related to the `builder` module.
cache
Related to the `cache`-feature.
ci
Related to the continuous integration.
dependencies
Related to Serenity dependencies.
enhancement
An improvement to Serenity.
examples
Related to Serenity's examples.
gateway
Related to the `gateway` module.
http
Related to the `http` module.
model
Related to the `model` module.
utils
Related to the `utils` module.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
simd-json is not a performance improvement for serenity, has a ton of sketchy unsafe, and increases the maintenance burden and leads to serenity containing a json compatibility layer(!). This PR just removes all that, although a faster json decoding implementation is on the table in the future if the compatibility layer is kept out of tree and it is measurably faster for serenity's usecase (if benchmark data is wanted, I can probably provide anonymized payloads for a 260k+ guild startup).