Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[WIP] the Implementaion of Parallel EVM 2.0 #22

Open
wants to merge 8 commits into
base: Parallel_1.0_based_onv1.1.10
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

setunapo
Copy link
Owner

@setunapo setunapo commented May 20, 2022

Description

This is part 2 of the implementation of BEP 130:Parallel Transaction Execution
The implementation part 1 can be found at: Parallel 1.0 Implementation

The motivation and architecture design could refer the BEP-130 document.
As noted in Parallel 1.0, Parallel 2.0 is a performance enhancement version, it tries to improve the performance based on the architecture of Parallel 1.0 by introducing more advanced methodologies.

Specification

Architecture

The architecture of Parallel 2.0 is based on Parallel 1.0, it only touches the execution layer, mainly state_processor.go and state_db.go, state_object.go, the architecture can be briefly described with 3 diagrams too:

  • Module
  • Pipeline
  • Lifecycle of transaction

Module

Here is the major components of Parallel 2.0
image

Pipeline

Pipeline of Parallel 2.0

Take 8 concurrency as an example for a brief view.

image

Post the Pipeline of Parallel 1.0 for comparison.
image
The pipeline of 1.0 and 2.0 are quite different. There are lots of changes, the most obvious changes include:

  • There is no waiting state, a transaction can be executed without waiting for its previous transaction.
  • A new shadow routine is created for each slot.
  • Stage1 & Stage2 are introduced.
  • A new routine is created: RT Conflict Check.
  • Conflict Check, Finalize, Merge are all moved into the main routine dispatcher.

Lifecycle of transaction

Lifecycle of Parallel 2.0
image
Post the lifecycle of 1.0 for comparison.
image
As the transaction lifecycle, the main differences are:

  • No dispatch IPC cost.
  • No waiting state.
  • UnconfirmedAccess.
  • LightCopy.
  • NewSlotDB is now moved to execution routine, while conflict detect & finalize are now in main dispatcher routine.

Introduce features of 2.0

Streaming Pipeline
If a Tx's execution stage(EVM) is completed, it doesn't need to wait for its previous transaction's merge result. The transaction can queue its result to the shadow slot and move on to execute the next transaction in the pending queue.
Operations of ConflictDetect, Finalize, Tx Result Merge will all be done by the main dispatcher. And each execution slot will have a shadow slot, it is a backup slot, do exactly the same job as the primary slot. Shadow slot is used to make sure redo can be scheduled ASAP.

Universal Unconfirmed State Access
It is very complicate, with unconfirmed state access, there will be a priority to access StateObject:
Self Dirty ➝ UnConfirmed Dirty ➝ Main StateDB(dirty, pending, snapshot and trie tree)
In a word, it should try best to get the desired information to reduce conflict rate.

Conflict Detect 2.0
In Parallel 1.0, the conflict detecter is a simple "double for loop" to see if two SlotDB has overlapped state change. We mark the execution result as conflicted if it reads a state which has been changed by other transactions within the conflict window.
But in Parallel 2.0, we do conflict check based on read, we no longer care about what has been changed, the only thing we should care is to check what we read is correct or not. We will keep the detail read record and compare with the main StateDB on conflict Detect. It is more straightforward and accurate.
And a new routine call Stage2ConfirmLoop is added to do conflict detect in advance, when most if the transactions have been executed at least once and it is configurable.

Parallel KV Conflict Detect
It is CPU consuming to do conflict check, especially the storage check. We have to go through all the read address, each address could have lots of KV read record. It is one of the bottlenecks right now, we do KV conflict detect to speed it up.

Memory: Shared Memory Pool&LightCopy&ZeroCopy
According to the memory analysis for the parallel 1.0, CopyForSlot will allocate 62K memory every time. Since the memory mostly is costed by the maps, we can use sync.Pool to manage all the maps. We can recycle the maps used by the slot db asynchronously when the block is committing.
Parallel 1.0 use DeepCopy for Copy-On-Write, it is cpu&memory consuming when the storage contains lots of KV elements. We replace it by LightCopy to avoid redundant memory copy of StateObject. With LightCopy, we do not copy any of the storage, actually it is not an option, but a must if we use UnConfirmed Reference , since the storage would be accessed from different unconfirmed DB, we can not simply copy all the KV elements of a single state object.
And we use map in sequential mode and sync.map in parallel mode for concurrent StateObject access.

Trie prefetch In Advance
Trie prefetch is key to save the cost of validation, we will do trie prefetch even for unconfirmed results to make sure the trie prefetch can be scheduled ASAP.

Dispatcher 2.0
Parallel 2.0 actually removed the dispatch action, the dispatch channel IPC is no longer needed. Dispatch 2.0 has 2 parts:
static dispatch & dynamic dispatch.
Static dispatch is done at the beginning of block process, it is responsible to make sure potential conflict transactions are dispatched to the same slot and try best to make workload balance between slots.
Dynamic dispatch is for runtime, there is a stolen mode when a slot finished its static dispatched tasks, it can steal a transaction from other busy slot.

Corner Case

The behavior of parallel is somehow different from sequential and there are corners cases we have to handle specially.

  • don't panic if there is anything wrong reading state
  • skip system address's balance check
  • handle WBNB contract to reduce conflict rate by balance make up, a new interface GetBalanceOpCode is added.

Performance Test

I setup 2 instance to test the performance benefit, with parallel number 8 and --pipecommit enabled.
The 2 instances use same hardware configuration, with 16 cores, 64G memory, 7T SSD,
It ran for ~50hours , The total block process(execution, validation, commit) cost reduce by ~20% -> ~50%, the benefits varies for difference block pattern.
image

@setunapo setunapo force-pushed the Parallel_2.0_based_onv1.1.10 branch from 2fd74b0 to 94e1b4e Compare May 20, 2022 10:35
1.features of 2.0:
  ** Streaming Pipeline
  ** Implement universal unconfirmed state db reference, try best to get account object state.
  ** New conflict detect, check based on what it has read.
  ** Do parallel KV conflict check for large KV read
  ** new Interface StateDBer and ParallelStateDB
  ** shared memory pool for parallel objects
  ** use map in sequential mode and sync.map in parallel mode for concurrent StateObject access
  ** replace DeepCopy by LightCopy to avoid redundant memory copy of StateObject
  ** do trie prefetch in advance
  ** dispatcher 2.0
     Static Dispatch & Dynamic Dispatch
     Stolen mode for TxReq when a slot finished its static dispatched tasks
     RealTime result confirm in Stage2, when most if the tx have been executed at least once
     Make it configurable

2.Handle of corner case:
 ** don't panic if there is anything wrong reading state
 ** handle system address, skip its balance check
 ** handle WBNB contract to reduce conflict rate by balance make up
    WBNB balance makeup by GetBalanceOpCode & depth
    add a lock to fix WBNB make up concurrent crash
    add a new interface GetBalanceOpCode
@setunapo setunapo force-pushed the Parallel_2.0_based_onv1.1.10 branch from 94e1b4e to 27e324f Compare May 21, 2022 13:29
core/state_processor.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
core/state_processor.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
core/state_processor.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
txReq: txReq,
receipt: receipt,
err: err,
func (p *ParallelStateProcessor) runConfirmStage2Loop() {

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can we have a better name for stage2

core/state_processor.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
}

// start several routines to do conflict check
func StartKvCheckLoop() {

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can we start this in init()?

core/state/statedb.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@setunapo setunapo force-pushed the Parallel_2.0_based_onv1.1.10 branch from 7b4ddaf to 21723fd Compare May 25, 2022 07:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants