Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Use the newer names for STACK_OF(T) functions with BoringSSL #2231

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 2, 2024
Merged

Use the newer names for STACK_OF(T) functions with BoringSSL #2231

merged 1 commit into from
May 2, 2024

Commits on May 1, 2024

  1. Use the newer names for STACK_OF(T) functions with BoringSSL 

    This is yet another symptom of
sfackler#1944.

Ideally rust-openssl would use the type-safe wrappers, which are the
actual public APIs. Right now, rust-openssl's STACK_OF(T) handling is a
safety regression from C. This PR doesn't address the safety issue, only
works around the BoringSSL porting issue.
    @davidben
    davidben committed May 1, 2024
    Configuration menu
    Copy the full SHA
    ef65d8d View commit details
    Browse the repository at this point in the history