How to Decrease Number of Timesteps for RF Plasma? #113
-
I'm trying to build a simulation of an RF plasma jet, but I'm quickly realizing a major pitfall: there are WAY too many timesteps to cover anything close to 1 second (ideally longer) with a teeny-tiny timestep on the order of 1e-9 seconds. Is there any way to significantly increase the time-step while still approximating the RF behavior? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 1 comment 4 replies
-
The small time steps is one for the main limitations for RF plasma simulation in general. One needs the time resolution to capture the effects of the oscillating plasma sheath. We have some acceleration methods, but they are currently for metastable species. We also use HPCs to help reduce the wall time of the simulations. One question I have is what exactly are you trying to capture in this model? Currently one of the undergrads at NCSU, @gsgall, is helping with coupling Zapdos with MOOSE's Navier-Stokes module. When coupling with Navier-Stokes, sub-cycling can used, such that Zapdos resolve the plasma fluid equation for so many RF cycles every so many time steps of the Navier-Stokes solve. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
The small time steps is one for the main limitations for RF plasma simulation in general. One needs the time resolution to capture the effects of the oscillating plasma sheath. We have some acceleration methods, but they are currently for metastable species. We also use HPCs to help reduce the wall time of the simulations. One question I have is what exactly are you trying to capture in this model? Currently one of the undergrads at NCSU, @gsgall, is helping with coupling Zapdos with MOOSE's Navier-Stokes module. When coupling with Navier-Stokes, sub-cycling can used, such that Zapdos resolve the plasma fluid equation for so many RF cycles every so many time steps of the Navier-Stokes solve.