Double source plane likelihood with the MST effect and sampling of gamma_pl

[sibirrer]

No description provided.

[review-notebook-app]

Check out this pull request on 

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.

---

Powered by ReviewNB

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 98.64865% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 99.18%. Comparing base (dcf3d3b) to head (40832a8).
Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Files	Patch %	Lines
hierarc/Likelihood/cosmo_likelihood.py	87.50%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #42      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   99.09%   99.18%   +0.09%     
==========================================
  Files          49       49              
  Lines        2531     2578      +47     
==========================================
+ Hits         2508     2557      +49     
+ Misses         23       21       -2     

Files	Coverage Δ
.../Likelihood/LensLikelihood/base_lens_likelihood.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...c/Likelihood/LensLikelihood/double_source_plane.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...ierarc/Likelihood/LensLikelihood/mag_likelihood.py	100.00% <ø> (ø)
hierarc/Likelihood/hierarchy_likelihood.py	97.87% <100.00%> (+0.11%)	⬆️
hierarc/Likelihood/lens_sample_likelihood.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...ierarc/Sampling/Distributions/lens_distribution.py	97.05% <100.00%> (-1.31%)	⬇️
hierarc/Sampling/ParamManager/lens_param.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
hierarc/Sampling/ParamManager/param_manager.py	100.00% <ø> (ø)
hierarc/Likelihood/cosmo_likelihood.py	95.83% <87.50%> (+3.20%)	⬆️

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes