-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 771
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Sinon no longer throws when stubbing non-existent properties #1508
Comments
Thanks to your test I was able to automate the search for this using From the discussion, I am not totally sure how it was decided we should go from throwing on non-existent properties to support stubbing them, but maybe @lucasfcosta remembers more? Anyway, this change was intentional and can't be reversed now (if so, use 1.x). The only thing I feel is an issue, is that this is a breaking change (as you show), that is not covered in the migration guide from 1.x to 2.x. That should be remedied. |
Hi @schreifels, thanks for your issue! As @fatso83 commented, this has been an intentional change in order to allow stubbing values, if I'm not mistaken. Also, the reason why you are not getting a stub into the object itself when doing this is because you are not creating any When creating stubs, even when we're not creating stubs for methods, they must replace the original property on the object. TL;DR:
I have this change ready right here and all tests pass. I will reopen this issue to get feedback on this new behavior and if everyone agrees I can just push this change and open a PR, it would take me only a few minutes. |
This seems to reasonable to me, thanks for the explanation @lucasfcosta and @fatso83! |
This is related to #1537, and we should close this issue if the conclusion is to fix that regression behavior. |
@lucasfcosta I have now digged down in this and it turns out we have never supported stubbing undefined properties. It always resulted in an exception, up until commit 278c2ce (which is when you added getters/setters). After this commit we still don't support it in a way, as no stub is created, but this is a regression and a bug in any case. Now knowing this, this directly affects #1552 and friends, and I am now inline with the rest of the team that we should not support this in any way (sandbox or not). The bug introduced in 278c2ce should be fixed in any case. Full testcase for verification: |
This was a longer discussion that can be found in the issues sinonjs#1508, sinonjs#1552 and sinonjs#1537 - and internally amongst the core team. Support for stubbing props using get()/set() was added in sinonjs#1237 and also worked for undefined properties. This type of behavior (stubbing undefined props) has been explicitly disabled for sandboxes, so in order for Sinon to behave in a consistent way, we should do the same here. This change will bring normal stubs back to how it has used to be historically, and will make sandbox stubs and normal sinon stubs behave the same. It might break things for people relying on the behavior that has been present since Sinon 2.0, but it should make things more reliable going forward.
This was a longer discussion that can be found in the issues sinonjs#1508, sinonjs#1552 and sinonjs#1537 - and internally amongst the core team. Support for stubbing props using get()/set() was added in sinonjs#1237 and also worked for undefined properties. This type of behavior (stubbing undefined props) has been explicitly disabled for sandboxes, so in order for Sinon to behave in a consistent way, we should do the same here. This change will bring normal stubs back to how it has used to be historically, and will make sandbox stubs and normal sinon stubs behave the same. It might break things for people relying on the behavior that has been present since Sinon 2.0, but it should make things more reliable going forward.
This was a longer discussion that can be found in the issues #1508, #1552 and #1537 - and internally amongst the core team. Support for stubbing props using get()/set() was added in #1237 and also worked for undefined properties. This type of behavior (stubbing undefined props) has been explicitly disabled for sandboxes, so in order for Sinon to behave in a consistent way, we should do the same here. This change will bring normal stubs back to how it has used to be historically, and will make sandbox stubs and normal sinon stubs behave the same. It might break things for people relying on the behavior that has been present since Sinon 2.0, but it should make things more reliable going forward.
Fixed in #1557. To be released shortly. |
This was a longer discussion that can be found in the issues sinonjs#1508, sinonjs#1552 and sinonjs#1537 - and internally amongst the core team. Support for stubbing props using get()/set() was added in sinonjs#1237 and also worked for undefined properties. This type of behavior (stubbing undefined props) has been explicitly disabled for sandboxes, so in order for Sinon to behave in a consistent way, we should do the same here. This change will bring normal stubs back to how it has used to be historically, and will make sandbox stubs and normal sinon stubs behave the same. It might break things for people relying on the behavior that has been present since Sinon 2.0, but it should make things more reliable going forward.
What did you expect to happen?
When calling
sinon.stub(obj, 'nonexistentProperty');
, I would expect it to throw an error, e.g. "Attempted to wrap undefined property".What actually happens
It does not throw (nor does it create a stub on the object at that property).
How to reproduce
Interestingly, if you use the deprecated 3rd argument to
sinon.stub
, it does still work, as shown in this example:(I would have expected both tests to pass.)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: