Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow editing headers #41

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 15, 2016
Merged

Allow editing headers #41

merged 2 commits into from
Sep 15, 2016

Conversation

andrefgneves
Copy link
Contributor

Hi,

here's a quick go at modifying HTTP headers (#11).

@gjtorikian
Copy link
Collaborator

gjtorikian commented Sep 15, 2016

Nice!

Have you tried running the test locally? Curious to know why it broke.

@andrefgneves
Copy link
Contributor Author

I did and they pass. Not sure why they fail on Travis.

screen shot

@gjtorikian
Copy link
Collaborator

Well, I confirmed that locally this does what the PR says, so thanks!

I know this problem existed before this PR, but would you mind expanding the value text box so that it fits the length of the table? It was weird when adding a header value, but now I think the problem is exacerbated when trying to edit!

2016-09-15_15-55-18

@andrefgneves
Copy link
Contributor Author

Done

@gjtorikian
Copy link
Collaborator

Aaaand the test passes because magic. Cool, cool.

Thank you!

@gjtorikian gjtorikian merged commit fa65b29 into skevy:master Sep 15, 2016
@hardchor
Copy link

Has this been released yet?

@kimegede
Copy link

kimegede commented Dec 6, 2016

@hardchor it was merged into master the 16th September.

@gjtorikian
Copy link
Collaborator

I don't think it was released yet. I'll try to deploy one when I get the chance.

@astanciu
Copy link

still no release?

@andrefgneves andrefgneves deleted the patch-1 branch February 13, 2017 05:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants