Add RFC for changing the smithy-rs changelog process (#3313)

_By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify,
copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your
choice._

design/src/SUMMARY.md

@@ -68,6 +68,7 @@
   - [RFC-0039: Forward Compatible Errors](./rfcs/rfc0039_forward_compatible_errors.md)
   - [RFC-0040: Behavior Versions](./rfcs/rfc0040_behavior_versions.md)
   - [RFC-0041: Improve client error ergonomics](./rfcs/rfc0041_improve_client_error_ergonomics.md)
+  - [RFC-0042: File-per-change changelog](./rfcs/rfc0042_file_per_change_changelog.md)
 
 - [Contributing](./contributing/overview.md)
   - [Writing and debugging a low-level feature that relies on HTTP](./contributing/writing_and_debugging_a_low-level_feature_that_relies_on_HTTP.md)

design/src/rfcs/overview.md

@@ -51,3 +51,4 @@
 - [RFC-0039: Forward Compatible Errors](./rfc0039_forward_compatible_errors.md)
 - [RFC-0040: Behavior Versions](./rfc0040_behavior_versions.md)
 - [RFC-0041: Improve client error ergonomics](./rfc0041_improve_client_error_ergonomics.md)
+- [RFC-0042: File-per-change changelog](./rfc0042_file_per_change_changelog.md)

design/src/rfcs/rfc0042_file_per_change_changelog.md

@@ -0,0 +1,133 @@
+RFC: File-per-change changelog
+==============================
+
+> Status: RFC
+>
+> Applies to: client and server
+
+For a summarized list of proposed changes, see the [Changes Checklist] section.
+
+Historically, the smithy-rs and AWS SDK for Rust's changelogs and release notes have been
+generated from the `changelogger` tool in `tools/ci-build/changelogger`. This is a tool built
+specifically for development and release of smithy-rs, and it requires developers to add
+changelog entries to a root `CHANGELOG.next.toml` file. Upon release, the `[[smithy-rs]]` entries
+in this file go into the smithy-rs release notes, and the `[[aws-sdk-rust]]` entries are associated
+with a smithy-rs release commit hash, and added to the `aws/SDK_CHANGELOG.next.json` for
+incorporation into the AWS SDK's changelog when it releases.
+
+This system has gotten us far, but it has always made merging PRs into main more difficult
+since the central `CHANGELOG.next.toml` file is almost always a merge conflict for two PRs
+with changelog entries.
+
+This RFC proposes a new approach to change logging that will remedy the merge conflict issue,
+and explains how this can be done without disrupting the current release process.
+
+The proposed developer experience
+---------------------------------
+
+There will be a `changelog/` directory in the smithy-rs root where
+developers can add changelog entry Markdown files. Any file name can be picked
+for these entries. Suggestions are the development branch name for the
+change, or the PR number.
+
+The changelog entry format will change to make it easier to duplicate entries
+across both smithy-rs and aws-sdk-rust, a common use-case.
+
+This new format will make use of Markdown front matter in the YAML format.
+This change in format has a couple benefits:
+- It's easier to write change entries in Markdown than in a TOML string.
+- There's no way to escape special characters (such as quotes) in a TOML string,
+  so the text that can be a part of the message will be expanded.
+
+While it would be preferable to use TOML for the front matter (and there are libraries
+that support that), it will use YAML so that GitHub's Markdown renderer will recognize it.
+
+A changelog entry file will look as follows:
+
+```markdown
+---
+# Adding `aws-sdk-rust` here duplicates this entry into the SDK changelog.
+applies_to: ["client", "server", "aws-sdk-rust"]
+authors: ["author1", "author2"]
+references: ["smithy-rs#1234", "aws-sdk-rust#1234"]
+# The previous `meta` section is broken up into its constituents:
+breaking: false
+# This replaces "tada":
+new_feature: false
+bug_fix: false
+---
+
+Some message for the change.
+```
+
+Implementation
+--------------
+
+When a release is performed, the release script will generate the release notes,
+update the `CHANGELOG.md` file, copy SDK changelog entries into the SDK,
+and delete all the files in `changelog/`.
+
+### SDK Entries
+
+The SDK changelog entries currently end up in `aws/SDK_CHANGELOG.next.json`, and each entry
+is given `age` and `since_commit` entries. The age is a number that starts at zero, and gets
+incremented with every smithy-rs release. When it reaches a hardcoded threshold, that entry
+is removed from `aws/SDK_CHANGELOG.next.json`. The SDK release process uses the `since_commit`
+to determine which changelog entries go into the next SDK release's changelog.
+
+The SDK release process doesn't write back to smithy-rs, and history has shown that it
+can't since this leads to all sorts of release issues as PRs get merged into smithy-rs
+while the release is in progress. Thus, this `age`/`since_commit` dichotomy needs to
+stay in place.
+
+The `aws/SDK_CHANGELOG.next.json` will stay in place in its current format without changes.
+Its JSON format is capable of escaping characters in the message string, so it will be
+compatible with the transition from TOML to Markdown with YAML front matter.
+
+The `SDK_CHANGELOG.next.json` file has had merge conflicts in the past, but this only
+happened when the release process wasn't followed correctly. If we're consistent with
+our release process, it should never have conflicts.
+
+### Safety requirements
+
+Implementation will be tricky since it needs to be done without disrupting the existing
+release process. The biggest area of risk is the SDK sync job that generates individual
+commits in the aws-sdk-rust repo for each commit in the smithy-rs release. Fortunately,
+the `changelogger` is invoked a single time at the very end of that process, and only
+the latest `changelogger` version that is included in the build image. Thus, we can safely
+refactor the `changelogger` tool so long as the command-line interface for it remains
+backwards compatible. (We _could_ change the CLI interface as well, but it will
+require synchronizing the smithy-rs changes with changes to the SDK release scripts.)
+
+At a high level, these requirements must be observed to do this refactor safely:
+- The CLI for the `changelogger render` subcommand _MUST_ stay the same, or have minimal
+  backwards compatible changes made to it.
+- The `SDK_CHANGELOG.next.json` format can change, but _MUST_ remain a single JSON file.
+  If it is changed at all, the existing file _MUST_ be transitioned to the new format,
+  and a mechanism _MUST_ be in place for making sure it is the correct format after
+  merging with other PRs. It's probably better to leave this file alone though, or make
+  any changes to it backwards compatible.
+
+Future Improvements
+-------------------
+
+After the initial migration, additional niceties could be added such as pulling authors
+from git history rather than needing to explicitly state them (at least by default; there
+should always be an option to override the author in case a maintainer adds a changelog
+entry on behalf of a contributor).
+
+Changes checklist
+-----------------
+
+- [ ] Refactor changelogger and smithy-rs-tool-common to separate the changelog
+      serialization format from the internal representation used for rendering and splitting.
+- [ ] Implement deserialization for the new Markdown entry format
+- [ ] Incorporate new format into the `changelogger render` subcommand
+- [ ] Incorporate new format into the `changelogger split` subcommand
+- [ ] Port existing `CHANGELOG.next.toml` to individual entries
+- [ ] Update `sdk-lints` to fail if `CHANGELOG.next.toml` exists at all to avoid losing
+      changelog entries during merges.
+- [ ] Dry-run test against the smithy-rs release process.
+- [ ] Dry-run test against the SDK release process.
+
+[Changes Checklist]: #changes-checklist