Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add bipartite adjacency maps #207

Merged
merged 22 commits into from
Jun 27, 2019
Merged

Conversation

vasalf
Copy link
Contributor

@vasalf vasalf commented May 31, 2019

No description provided.

@snowleopard
Copy link
Owner

@vasalf Many thanks for the PR! I've left a bunch of comments, please have a look.

test/Main.hs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@snowleopard
Copy link
Owner

@vasalf There is a test failure:

============ Eq (Bipartite.AdjacencyMap a b) ============
Test failure:
    (x == y) == ((leftAdjacencyMap x == rightAdjacencyMap x) && (leftAdjacencyMap y == rightAdjacencyMap y))
*** Failed! Falsified (after 3 tests):
empty
vertices [-2] [-2]

The full log is here: https://travis-ci.org/snowleopard/alga/jobs/550349421

Please investigate.

@vasalf
Copy link
Contributor Author

vasalf commented Jun 26, 2019

@vasalf There is a test failure:

============ Eq (Bipartite.AdjacencyMap a b) ============
Test failure:
    (x == y) == ((leftAdjacencyMap x == rightAdjacencyMap x) && (leftAdjacencyMap y == rightAdjacencyMap y))
*** Failed! Falsified (after 3 tests):
empty
vertices [-2] [-2]

The full log is here: https://travis-ci.org/snowleopard/alga/jobs/550349421

Please investigate.

@snowleopard Thanks for pointing it out! It turned out that the test was wrong. I fixed it. Hope it will pass this time (it passes on my machine, but we know that means nothing).

I also fixed a small bug in Show instance.

@snowleopard snowleopard merged commit 7c43d08 into snowleopard:master Jun 27, 2019
@snowleopard
Copy link
Owner

Thanks, merged!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants