fix: ESM default import This expression is not callable

[yutak23]

This ought to fix #228

ESM seems incompatible in CommonJS PJs with default export (see microsoft/TypeScript#52086).
I think there are two solutions to make TypeScript types compatible with both CommonJS and ESM.

1. Create a new type definition for ESM
   reference: https://www.typescriptlang.org/docs/handbook/esm-node.html#packagejson-exports-imports-and-self-referencing
2. Change type definitions to support both CommonJS and ESM

Case 1, I would make a copy of the current index.d.ts, rename the file to index.d.mts, and change package.json as follows.

  "exports": {
    ".": {
      "import": {
        "types": "./index.d.mts",
        "default": "./lib/esm/index.js"
      },
      "require": {
        "types": "./index.d.ts",
        "default": "./index.js"
      }
    },
    "./package.json": "./package.json"
  }

However, I think this is redundant and low-maintainability because we have to manage two type definitions, so I tried to modify it in the second way(Case 2).

Explanation of this modification

• By setting export = , both CommonJS and ESM are supported.
  I do not expect any impact on existing CommonJS implementations of TypeScript developers. Originally, when using export default, as described in Default Exports, the esModuleInterop option must be used, and testing has confirmed that it can be compiled with this setting.
  Also, testing confirms that the project can be compiled with the project in the ESM configuration.

For this change, I refer to the following

• https://www.typescriptlang.org/docs/handbook/esm-node.html#packagejson-exports-imports-and-self-referencing
• https://www.typescriptlang.org/docs/handbook/declaration-files/templates/module-d-ts.html#default-exports
• https://www.typescriptlang.org/docs/handbook/declaration-files/templates/module-function-d-ts.html
• https://www.typescriptlang.org/docs/handbook/modules.html

[yutak23]

@mindhells

To avoid increased maintenance costs I have changed the content of the PR from #230.

I would appreciate it if you could review and respond to the content of the PR so that it can be made available to ES Module projects.

[mindhells]

LGTM and don't expect any impact on CommonJS either, but I'll publish as a new minor just in case.

[mindhells]

Published as 3.7.0
Thanks a lot @yutak23