Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Changes in CI and build.sbt #1631

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Nov 28, 2022
Merged

Changes in CI and build.sbt #1631

merged 8 commits into from
Nov 28, 2022

Conversation

Pask423
Copy link
Contributor

@Pask423 Pask423 commented Nov 14, 2022

No description provided.

@Pask423 Pask423 self-assigned this Nov 14, 2022
bartlomiej.zylinski added 2 commits November 14, 2022 22:50
@Pask423 Pask423 requested a review from adamw November 15, 2022 10:02
@adamw
Copy link
Member

adamw commented Nov 15, 2022

Great! I wanted to do that for a long time. This follows how things are done in tapir, right?

One thing missing is mergify configuration so that merging steward PR works

@Pask423
Copy link
Contributor Author

Pask423 commented Nov 15, 2022

Yes, exactly. Sorry I forgot about .mergify config.

- check-success=ci (JS1)
- check-success=ci (JS2)
- check-success=ci (Native)
- check-success=ci (2.12, JVM)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

2.11?

build.sbt Outdated
lazy val rootProject = (project in file("."))
.settings(commonSettings: _*)
.settings(
publish / skip := true,
name := "sttp",
testJVM := (Test / test).all(filterProject(p => !p.contains("JS") && !p.contains("Native"))).value,
testJS1 := (Test / test)
.all(filterProject(p => p.contains("JS") && (p.contains("2_11") || p.contains("2_12"))))
testJS2_11 := (Test / test)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

how does this differ from testScoped?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

JS tests are run in different way then others there is a comment in ci file, it works the same way in tapir

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hm which comment?

@adamw adamw merged commit fb62e7b into master Nov 28, 2022
@mergify mergify bot deleted the featuer/tapir-style-ci branch November 28, 2022 10:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants