Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

NAT hardening #496

Closed
mvines opened this issue Jun 29, 2018 · 3 comments
Closed

NAT hardening #496

mvines opened this issue Jun 29, 2018 · 3 comments
Labels
stale [bot only] Added to stale content; results in auto-close after a week.
Milestone

Comments

@mvines
Copy link
Member

mvines commented Jun 29, 2018

#494 landed basic support for NATs that honor UPnP to open public UDP ports. Not all NATs to though. This issue is meta issue to spend some read time surveying all the different NAT configurations we want/need to support for both thin and full nodes, and then to file more actionable issues to address.

@garious
Copy link
Contributor

garious commented Feb 6, 2019

Not sure if this is helpful, just passing it on. https://medium.com/paritytech/why-libp2p-13085ed0c9c8

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Sep 16, 2020

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs.

@stale stale bot added the stale [bot only] Added to stale content; results in auto-close after a week. label Sep 16, 2020
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Sep 24, 2020

This stale issue has been automatically closed. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot closed this as completed Sep 24, 2020
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 3, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
stale [bot only] Added to stale content; results in auto-close after a week.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants