We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Devs are not seeing good ROI on Criterion, and would prefer to keep cargo watch -x bench running as fast as possible. We should consider one of:
cargo watch -x bench
benches
--features=criterion
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Fixed in #1032. After RustConf, it became clear that we don't need both benchmarking suites to coexist, that criterion is just too heavyweight.
And that benchcmp gives us the dev workflow that made criterion so appealing: https://github.com/BurntSushi/cargo-benchcmp
Sorry, something went wrong.
Bump eslint from 7.11.0 to 7.12.0 in /token-lending/js (solana-labs#725)
7473fa0
Bumps [eslint](https://github.com/eslint/eslint) from 7.11.0 to 7.12.0. - [Release notes](https://github.com/eslint/eslint/releases) - [Changelog](https://github.com/eslint/eslint/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md) - [Commits](eslint/eslint@v7.11.0...v7.12.0) Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
vote: update benches and tests to TowerSync (solana-labs#725)
499d36e
986e09e
garious
No branches or pull requests
Devs are not seeing good ROI on Criterion, and would prefer to keep
cargo watch -x bench
running as fast as possible. We should consider one of:benches
folder back to libtest--features=criterion
).The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: