Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[HLD] DSCP/TC remapping for tunnel traffic #950
[HLD] DSCP/TC remapping for tunnel traffic #950
Changes from 3 commits
ef9ded9
37a50b5
9492c49
48eec5c
12d907f
b7980db
5b6e794
55024e8
bec3417
b41966b
76baf8a
eadfc89
29e67ca
909691c
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does that mean PG 2 and 6 will be used as lossless PG? In that case
BUFFER_PG|<port>|2
,BUFFER_PG|<port>|6
need to be configured. But traditional buffer manager supports3-4
only. This also needs to be updated#define LOSSLESS_PGS "3-4"
string buffer_pg_key = port + m_cfgBufferPgTable.getTableNameSeparator() + LOSSLESS_PGS;