Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[action] [PR:15668] [Mellanox] [SN4410] Support new breakout modes for PAM4 #16400

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 3, 2023

Conversation

mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator

Why I did it

Add new breakout modes to be used in PAM4 supported cables

Work item tracking
  • Microsoft ADO (number only):

How I did it

How to verify it

Verified the 50G per lane breakout modes are applied properly on the switch

root@r-ocelot-02:/home/admin# show interfaces status
 Interface Lanes Speed MTU FEC Alias Vlan Oper Admin Type Asym PFC
----------- ------------------------------- ------- ----- ----- ------- ------ ------ ------- ----------------------------------------------- ----------
 Ethernet0 0,1 100G 9100 N/A etp1 routed down up QSFP28 or later N/A
 Ethernet8 8 50G 9100 N/A etp2 routed down up QSFP-DD Double Density 8X Pluggable Transceiver N/A
 Ethernet16 16,17,18,19 200G 9100 N/A etp3 routed down up QSFP-DD Double Density 8X Pluggable Transceiver N/A

Which release branch to backport (provide reason below if selected)

  • 201811
  • 201911
  • 202006
  • 202012
  • 202106
  • 202111
  • 202205
  • 202211
  • 202305

Tested branch (Please provide the tested image version)

Description for the changelog

Link to config_db schema for YANG module changes

A picture of a cute animal (not mandatory but encouraged)

)

- Why I did it
Add new breakout modes to be used in PAM4 supported cables

- How I did it

- How to verify it
Verified the 50G per lane breakout modes are applied properly on the switch

Signed-off-by: Vivek Reddy Karri <vkarri@nvidia.com>
@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Original PR: #15668

@mssonicbld mssonicbld merged commit 1908a04 into sonic-net:202305 Sep 3, 2023
17 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants