Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[action] [PR:17440] [Dell] S6100 - Update EEPROM API serial_number_str to return service tag instead of serial number #17494

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 15, 2023

Conversation

mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator

Why I did it

To modify EEPROM API serial_number_str to return service tag instead of serial number in Dell S6100.
Ref PR: #1239

Work item tracking
  • Microsoft ADO (number only):

How I did it

Update EEPROM API serial_number_str to return service tag instead of serial number.

How to verify it

Verify decode-syseeprom -s returns service tag in Dell S6100.

Logs: UT_logs.txt

Which release branch to backport (provide reason below if selected)

  • 201811
  • 201911
  • 202006
  • 202012
  • 202106
  • 202111
  • 202205
  • 202211
  • 202305

Tested branch (Please provide the tested image version)

Description for the changelog

[Dell] S6100 - Update EEPROM API serial_number_str to return service tag instead of serial number

Link to config_db schema for YANG module changes

A picture of a cute animal (not mandatory but encouraged)

…tag instead of serial number (sonic-net#17440)

To modify EEPROM API serial_number_str to return service tag instead of serial number in Dell S6100.
Ref PR: sonic-net#1239

How I did it
Update EEPROM API serial_number_str to return service tag instead of serial number.

How to verify it
Verify decode-syseeprom -s returns service tag in Dell S6100.
@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Original PR: #17440

@StormLiangMS
Copy link
Contributor

/azp run Azure.sonic-buildimage

Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@mssonicbld mssonicbld merged commit 9c8dbf6 into sonic-net:202305 Dec 15, 2023
10 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants