Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fixbug: EVPN issue in FRR template #4260
Fixbug: EVPN issue in FRR template #4260
Changes from 8 commits
b2d35e0
08c2945
ba84889
4c8a4c6
e99a2cf
244faf0
94ff75d
6cac8ec
1b04b91
6ba0066
7e9ef26
e14028a
4b6a51a
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
what should be the log message here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actually, this is an intermediate state. Maybe it should add some log with INFO level to display this state. Same problem at here https://github.com/Azure/sonic-buildimage/blob/master/dockers/docker-fpm-frr/bgpcfgd#L295
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We would also want to consider VLAN_INTERFACE as well - CFG_VLAN_INTF_TABLE_NAME
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for your suggestion. Have added VlanInterfaceMgr.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
is this true that vnet interface will only have interface name without ip addresses? @prsunny ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
no, vnet interface will also have ip address as any other regular entry. I don't think we need to mention about 'vnet' in this function as this is a generic handler. The comment can just state, "Interface table can have two keys, one with ip prefix and one without ip prefix".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@Pterosaur , can you modify the comment accordingly, current description is not accurate.