Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert "Add support for IP interface loopback action (#2307)" #2384

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

prabhataravind
Copy link
Contributor

This reverts commit 5043701.

Revert "[VS Test] Skip failing subport tests (#2370)"

This reverts commit 7175245.

What I did

Why I did it

How I verified it

Details if related

This reverts commit 5043701.

Revert "[VS Test] Skip failing subport tests (#2370)"

This reverts commit 7175245.
@prabhataravind
Copy link
Contributor Author

/azp run

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@prsunny
Copy link
Collaborator

prsunny commented Jul 21, 2022

@liorghub , please take a look

@prsunny
Copy link
Collaborator

prsunny commented Jul 22, 2022

@liorghub , We just re-added the subport test in this PR - #2389 and it failed. So somehow it is linked to the changes. Can you please investigate this with priority?

@liorghub
Copy link
Contributor

liorghub commented Jul 28, 2022

@liorghub , We just re-added the subport test in this PR - #2389 and it failed. So somehow it is linked to the changes. Can you please investigate this with priority?

@prsunny @dprital I tried to reproduce the issue that occured in vstest of PR #2389 but unfortunately I couldn't. In my run there were other failures.
vstest in PR #2389 failed since there were 2 keys in table ASIC_STATE:SAI_OBJECT_TYPE_VIRTUAL_ROUTER. I searched the code to understand what is the flow that creates a new key and found that it happens once on switch init and each time we create VRF or EVPN tunnel. My tests are not creating VRF or tunnel, therefore they could not cause the failure. If you still think otherwise, appreciate if we can work together to resolve the issue before reverting my commit (5043701)

@prsunny
Copy link
Collaborator

prsunny commented Jul 28, 2022

@liorghub , We just re-added the subport test in this PR - #2389 and it failed. So somehow it is linked to the changes. Can you please investigate this with priority?

@prsunny @dprital I tried to reproduce the issue that occured in vstest of PR #2389 but unfortunately I couldn't. In my run there were other failures. vstest in PR #2389 failed since there were 2 keys in table ASIC_STATE:SAI_OBJECT_TYPE_VIRTUAL_ROUTER. I searched the code to understand what is the flow that creates a new key and found that it happens once on switch init and each time we create VRF or EVPN tunnel. My tests are not creating VRF or tunnel, therefore they could not cause the failure. If you still think otherwise, appreciate if we can work together to resolve the issue before reverting my commit (5043701)

We are also not clear on the rootcause, but reverting your PR makes it pass, but with the changes, its failing. If you cannot repro it manually, can you try by reverting the changes one-by-one. Like remove intfmgrd but keep intforch and raise a PR. Lets try to narrow down.

@prsunny
Copy link
Collaborator

prsunny commented Jul 28, 2022

/azp run

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants